#A24 #FilmLemmy

  • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t know. Selling out on the one thing that made you stand out as a company? Sounds like a smart business decision to me.

  • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Our current strategy is making us worth a ton of money, so let’s change strategies to what all the companies that are losing are doing instead, so we can make money?

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s called cashing out, and it’s a smart thing to do when you want to maximize profits (to the detriment of the art).

    • egonallanon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I find the mob are honest upfront at least about what will happen to you if you piss them off.

  • canthidium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really hope they don’t abandon what made them great. They’ve become my favorite studio. Almost every movie they put out, I absolutely love or can at least appreciate the big swing. Movies like Lamb don’t get made by any other studio and still be able to be seen by most. I don’t understand this decision after how Everything Everywhere All at Once was received.

  • WhipTheLlama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would they have to keep up with their appraisal? There is no downside to not doing it, other than not being worth as much if they want to sell or IPO, but that would be true even without the equity firm’s investment and appraisal. No law says they have to meet the expectations set by a single investor. There is no legal duty requiring a company to maximize profits or shareholder value.

    However, even if such a law requiring them to maximize profits existed, it’s very reasonable that they would legally continue making the same types of movies that earned them that value in the first place. There couldn’t possibly be a requirement for them to change business strategies, else every company would eventually all end up in the same, most profitable industry. They’d all be selling movie theatre popcorn or something.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because if they don’t the PE firm either cancels bonuses for sr management or fires them outright.

      You can’t beat your boss.

    • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Laws? What the fuck are you talking about? You’re right in that their hand isn’t forced when making a business transaction such as this, but looking at it through the childish lens of “laws” is odd to say the least.

  • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah fuck. Hazbin Hotel is being produced by A24.

    Guess we can kiss that quality goodbye.

  • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    76
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand A24. Hereditary was a borderline comedy, Uncut Gems and EEAAO would work better as 20 minute shorts, and nothing happened in The Witch. They’re like the Marvel of hipster movies.