Sundray@lemmus.org to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 天前Wealth Hoarderslemmus.orgimagemessage-square57linkfedilinkarrow-up1671arrow-down113file-textcross-posted to: anticorporate@lemmy.giftedmc.com
arrow-up1658arrow-down1imageWealth Hoarderslemmus.orgSundray@lemmus.org to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 天前message-square57linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: anticorporate@lemmy.giftedmc.com
minus-squarebennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.decakelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 天前There should be an income maximum. It should be a little above the maximum happiness threshold. Any income above that should be taxed at 95%
minus-squaredustycups@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 天前Not disagreeing with you but this particular tax is on wealth. Imo there is a place for both.
There should be an income maximum. It should be a little above the maximum happiness threshold. Any income above that should be taxed at 95%
Not disagreeing with you but this particular tax is on wealth. Imo there is a place for both.