Hello,

I hope I’m not breaking any rule by posting this kind of content here.

Are you looking forward this movie?

  • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.netEnglish
    10·
    1 year ago

    Uhhh, is this real, cause if so, Ridley is not going to get any hardcore history buffs with this movie. They already have Waterloo, a movie that will literally take a whole army to top.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      There’s also a 6-hour-long silent film epic biography of Napoleon made in the 1920s by Abel Gance. It uses split screen in really interesting ways.

  • theragu40@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7·
    1 year ago

    Does this poster look like a cheap photoshop job to anyone else?

    I’m making no comment on the movie itself, I generally like Ridley Scott and Joaquin Phoenix.

    But this poster looks really off to me for some reason. Just a quick try at what’s bugging me…Joaquin’s face looks shopped into the hat/coat. The sword looks shopped into the hands. The entire horse and rider look copy/pasted over a stock background.

    • Entropywins@kbin.social
      1·
      1 year ago

      Is this young or old napolean… I’d imagine once he was commander of entire armies he used whatever he wanted…I’m no historian obviously

  • GrimChaos@lemm.eeEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    Looking forward to the movie… But i do wish it was a mini series, there is just so much to cover.

  • robocall@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    I’ll probably watch it. But I wouldn’t say I’m eagerly awaiting it like I did with Oppenheimer.

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    Yep, that’s a Napoleon alright.

    I love Ridley Scott, but whenever I think about this movie I can’t help but regret that Kubrick never got the chance to make his Nappy film.