• mycotrip@lemmy.ko4abp.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. They are an invaluable tool. I also use a tiling WM. I feel they work better with larger screens that offer more real estate.

  • calm.like.a.bomb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they’re a fad, they’ve been a fad for over 35 years, so no longer a fad. Get it?

    I don’t understand articles like this. Terminal multiplexers are tools that help people. And they’re great tools especially when you work in environments where persistent sessions save your ass.

  • Frater Mus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a saying from when the newspaper world that when a headline asks a question the answer is no.

    Multiplexers are critical to my workflow due to bandwidth limitations and intermittency. mosh+tmux saves my butt daily.

  • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry you’re getting downvoted to hell, good article. Just so people know, the guy in the article uses a terminal multiplexer too, and is simply talking about some limitations. The titles clickbait and it starts off quite critical but that’s to be expected in this day and age