Mika

She don’t have to. Record it via hidden mic, and it’s just an art of asking correctly. Like “Oh I remember something about F35. My professor told <obviously incorrect info> and that’s why it’s worse than…”

Obviously you need to know the subject a bit but mainly you need to know the cognitive tricks.

Technically it’s also powered the way he thinks, but the impact of it is minimal.

Prosecutor be like:

Oh please. Lots of people had relatives in Ukraine. These contacts were broken, because russian side didn’t want to listen from people that seen the events with their own eyes, and preferred to believe in the TV. Even when deep down they know that TV is lying. It’s not like they don’t have access to internet. The TV just gives a plausible deniability, an excuse to do nothing and play ignorance.

I mean modern CQB is surely better 🙃 https://t.me/style_military_ua/6440

I did exactly that lmao. And I’m not even having anti-AI stance, just the stuff they were telling was boring af and idk why didn’t they just wrap it in AI skill with instructions on how to write AI skills.

Company trainings are complete waste of time, always.

Just write down both responses and try both

You were lucky knife got stuck in and nobody tried to pull it off before you got the medical attention. The biggest risk is not the pain, it’s loss of blood. Which happens to get worse when you pull it off.

GPS is much easier to jam.

The way I see it, Starlink is more a military tech than civilian. It is a huge gamechanger on the battlefield and in the drone technology - it is the cheapest and most reliable way to obtain high speed network connection on a middlestrike drone.

So what Starlink would do depends on the will of American government. And that depends on who’s in charge. With all the consequences.

That depends on why you think it’s immoral today.

AI analysis of the code flow & AI-assisted debug (placing print statements, reproducing the issue, duping the print into it) transforms some 2-3 day investigations into half a day of work.

It depends on the task. Oneshotting 80% of the new feature and then failing to pick up on details can leave hard part.

But oneshotting even 30% of UI tests based on QA regression means you have 30% of regression covered. Ofc you need to verify if the test is indeed covering the test case, and for a big volume of tests it takes time, but it’s nowhere near what it takes to actually write the tests.

Pretty much my experience and I didn’t even have to do workflows or complex harnesses, I wrote a “dont ask” mode wrapper that gives rights to read/write a work dir & explanation that blockers & questions need to be written in a specific directory, and I listen to this directory with a GUI app that notifies me, then also a stop hook that verifies that that doc is updated when it stops, and has all the items done/blocked.

I did this cause I like the flexibility of a normal agentic chat session.

Recent LLM are smart enough to resolve many problems as is in agentic mode. Really strange to see “it doesnt work” copium instead of fighting for the means of production and looking for a way to have this setup purely local.

It feels so weird to read lemmy, as if I’m living in a different reality. To me, most of the time an agent can oneshot a ticket (if it has a good, non-vague description) or at least do 80-90% that can be fixed with several changes or prompts, and only odd tasks need more manual investigations than that.

Surely you still need a dev oversight and someone needs to do tech plans & lead the projects, but that’s not like anything people experience here.

Syncthing will also propagate removals or bad edits

Why not llama.cpp? Ollama is just a wrapper over it.

128 gb uram 🤤

Fucking saved.

Do you know what kind of open weights it can run, and at which t/s?

Probably should update the post with the Bethesda apology

https://www.reddit.com/r/classicfallout/comments/1vq5k38/comment/p4a86lz/

Cyberpunk has a whole layer of simplified English and futuristic slang that just kinda makes sense