

Clearly Big Fluoride isn’t paying off the right people!
Clearly Big Fluoride isn’t paying off the right people!
Too bad they didn’t share that opinion on 11/5/24.
They’ll just dodge the issue by insisting that being LGBTQ is a choice.
You then ask them two follow-ups:
Why would anyone choose to be LGBTQ, when they treat anyone like that as poorly as they do, and
When did they decide to be cishet, and what factors did they evaluate when they made their choice?
A Justice should have no loyalty but to the law.
First time reading about the GOP?
I did say I use Firefox. I was asking those who don’t.
Yes, I already do.
I asked because I don’t know if anyone who does use a Chromium browser has noticed an uptick in ads.
Last I checked Alphabet had something like $60 billion in profit.
At this point, they probably consider YouTube to be a loss leader while they siphon up everyone’s data.
I use Firefox. Is Ublock Origin still effective on YouTube since Google shoved out Manifest V3 onto Chromium-based browsers?
Why Amy? You and five other justices lied about Roe in your confirmation hearings. Bit hypocritical to assume Trump’s admin shouldn’t lie in court, isn’t it?
You must have missed this part:
Tesla instead found an unusually lucrative way to make money by flipping many of the off-lease cars to new buyers, according to four people familiar with Tesla’s retail operations.
THEY LITERALLY ARE DOING THAT.
But looking around these days, I see more and more people disagreeing with me.
Yes, clearly everyone else is wrong.
Wait- do you think that Tesla taking back leased cars and selling them as new is less important than adding new features via a software update?
You know that scene in Matilda when her dad shows her all the shady shit he does to sell junk cars, like rewinding the odometers and glueing the bumpers on? This is literally the 21st century version of that.
If you buy a car that doesn’t have all the “modern features” you want, that’s on you, even if those features can simply be enabled via software. But it’s literally fraud to advertise a car as new when it was previously leased out.
You’re not wrong, but that’s not the logical endpoint of the argument.
If they’re not “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” then the US has no ability to exercise any kind of authority over them, regardless of whether they’re people or property.
Under that argument, the US government legally or logically can not detain, deport, or traffic any noncitizens. It’s obviously an absurd thing to say.
It’s obvious, right?
In exchange for amplifying the right on Twitter and bankrolling Trump with cash, the GOP allowed Musk to eliminate the government agencies that were investigating him for his shitty business practices.
I read that as “we’re denying fewer claims because that was the reason our CEO got shot.”
Exactly like how USA got Bush/Cheney at the helm!
Kinda like a court saying “This ruling is so bad it only applies in this case and can’t be used as precedent in future cases.”
HEYWAITAMINUTE
Clearly if the Founders didn’t want SCOTUS the President to be given an RV airplane, they would have said as much!
-Clearance Thomas
So much of what the courts are ruling Trump can’t do could simply be legalized by Congress.
Almost as if the GOP wants to treat Trump like a king, and cry about it when the courts don’t acquiesce.
Or they’re a bunch of cowardly bitches who don’t want to take the blame for doing the unpopular things they actually want done, and are happy to let Trump be the face of shitty GOP policy.
Or, most likely… Both.
I didn’t mean Trump wanted Leo.
I meant he has so destroyed the international standing of the US that the College of Cardinals don’t see American influence as being an issue any longer.
So Trump was responsible for Pope Leo, just not in the way he wants to be.
No…?