I think the question is a very, to put it mildly, useless question. It’s a typical example of an analytic philosophical thought experiment, which is has basically nothing to do with real life. No one has ever been in a situation as it is described in the trolley problem.
That doesn’t mean that sometimes, unfortunately, we are in situations where we are where we experience a moral dilemma. Of course we’re often in a situation where we experience a form of moral dilemma. But moral dilemmas are always concrete, and you always experience them under specific conditions, in a specific context that is very complex. You have specific means to make the decision, and practically never are universal moral principles even helpful to make that decision.
As a matter of fact, moral principles are I would say empirically never really used to actually decide moral dilemmas. They are used after the fact to justify a decision, which is a typical form of moral communication.
The reason is obvious: @CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml chose to comment with their lemmy.ml account because most liberal instances are defederated from lemmygrad.ml.
Hard to say because they’re not always coherent. There’s a fair amount of vagueness and stream-of-consciousness. They never bring evidence though; they just spin narratives.
This guy punches left while modding “Pragmatic Leftist Theory” (!PLT@sh.itjust.works). In a surprise to no one, PJ posts there.