Oh no
The second comment from the devs is telling - sounds like they sent the message and then GOG just appended some emojis to it, and the devs were unaware.
Now ofc that’s from the devs directly, but considering it’s so oddly specific, it’s hard to imagine they made that up.
If it feels right, it’s always worthwhile:)
Yeah did that with my dad. As soon as he expressed that he doesn’t believe in conventional scientific methodology and academic consensus, I stopped discussing any of those topics with him.
No basis to discuss if he doesn’t even consider evidence for disproving his theories.
I would add to it that quantum computers are very specialized and as of now do not perform better at most conventional tasks.
So similar to APUs / NPUs, they might just be a very specialized PC part if they become available to the broader public at all.
Unfortunately a solid suggestion.
Weird I managed to keep a few over the span of years. But it’s also hyper specific knowledge domains, so I don’t think it qualifies as a hobby.
Yo wtf that’s mens rea / admission of guilt
They just admitted they knew it was bad and were like “but it’s legal in the US so it’s fine to send it there” but ignore it’s about as bad as it gets for legal symbols.
Here we go again
New palworld server boutta spawn on my network.
I assume it is mainly because his haircut and very pale skin used to be very unique and because his body language and facial expressions often does not match what people expect in a lot of public situations.
Unfortunately some of these things can also be explained by neurodiversity and people are projecting their personal grievances of Facebook/ meta onto that.
I don’t have a solution but I wanna bump this question, I am invested now.
??? So why mention the intoxicants at all if you weren’t responding to that?
It sure as hell isn’t I can tell you from experience, and I don’t think that’s the point of the comment.
The reason to mention it is to explain that people overcome this hurdle in many different ways, one of them is intoxicants. So other people struggle with this in the same way, they just have other means to go about it.
It’s not meant to encourage drinking, it’s meant to tell you that a bunch of people are regularly getting drunk in order to handle it.
Make one?
Besides all the other things people listed, in law we appreciate that sexual violence is kind of worse than just physical violence, and if there’s power dynamics at play and psychological dependency, it gets even more morally apprehensive.
What I’m saying even just the sexual nature makes it worse for me, but of course there’s more.
That said, I did not know about what Mark Wahlberg did, and obviously not great.
I think it’s one of those cases where the actual definition and the cultural definition deviate, and I accept that people are kinda just being a bit funny.
If people are using it to be degrading or berating, I will call it out (or just not interact with those people anymore) but I usually think it’s meant to be a bit self-critical, funny and endearing. I don’t really mind in that case, because it’s not said in offense, and I appreciate people making fun of themselves every once in a while.
Rockstar always chooses the most unique ways of marketing their games.
Yeah what a waste of good shit
If the VPN is for phoning home, of course there’s free client and server software.
But if it’s for spoofing a different location, you either get found out, or you have to pay.
I wanna live in a world where I do not pay for anything but there is stuff that you can only really get if you pay.
Peak Lemmy behaviour I love it