







Thanks for putting this together. Stuff like this is good for making it more approachable. I definitely have relatives that would benefit from this.
One note though, it would be good if the key included all of the icons and not just the three causes.
As the other commented pointed out, it would also be good to differentiate decentralized services, for example in the category with Mastodon and Bluesky.


Right before the end in the background you could sort of see him back on the skis.


Pretty sure that’s how we got here in the first place.



What I don’t understand about these people that only care when it affects them personally, is why they always seem to think everyone else should now care about their issue?
I mean, I do because I’m not an asshole, but the cognitive dissonance is wild.


I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that all the guys going from scamming you on infomercials into politics seem to end up in the same party. I’m going to count televangelists in that too.


The rule keeps the minority party from passing bills with the assistance of a minority of majority party members.
Of course. Why wouldn’t we want a rule that keeps us from passing a bill that the majority of members would vote for? /s


"We have learned that the vaccine is ineffective 1.
1. Vibes"


Never lose that child-like wonder narcissism.


As a species we are prone to assigning meaning to coincidences (or even just stuff that happened).


This is the correct reaction.


Republicans who personally benefit from a specific program think it should be funded and Republicans who don’t can’t see why they should care about anyone else. News at 11.
Those same people on ACA wouldn’t want to fund SNAP or Social Security or whatever else unless they personally benefit. It’s a lack of empathy from all involved, and the the disagreement comes from whether or not it affects them personally.


What the fuck is this entire sentence?
David Hirsch, former Republican candidate for New York State Assembly, on X: “While there are a lot of positives in this poll, there are some disturbing trends being influenced by the Woke Right like rising Holocaust Denialism, and that 12% are antisemitic and 19% accept them. We can fix this and other issues.”


Exactly. Trump didn’t win by courting centrists. He energized entirely new voters (albeit with racism).
Democrats insist that perpetually leaning further into corporatism and imperialism and abandoning marginalized groups like trans people and immigrants will win the “likely voters”.
A real winning strategy would be to have policies that actually inspire people and turn out new voters.
That would assume they actually want what they say they want though, instead of being controlled opposition.


Secure Annex has now found that the third wave uses the packages listed below.
VS Marketplace
iconkieftwo.icon-theme-materiall
prisma-inc.prisma-studio-assistance
prettier-vsc.vsce-prettier
flutcode.flutter-extension
csvmech.csvrainbow
codevsce.codelddb-vscode
saoudrizvsce.claude-devsce
clangdcode.clangd-vsce
cweijamysq.sync-settings-vscode
bphpburnsus.iconesvscode
klustfix.kluster-code-verify
vims-vsce.vscode-vim
yamlcode.yaml-vscode-extension
solblanco.svetle-vsce
vsceue.volar-vscode
redmat.vscode-quarkus-pro
msjsdreact.react-native-vsce
Open VSX
bphpburn.icons-vscode
tailwind-nuxt.tailwindcss-for-react
flutcode.flutter-extension
yamlcode.yaml-vscode-extension
saoudrizvsce.claude-dev
saoudrizvsce.claude-devsce
vitalik.solidity
Once the packages are accepted on the marketplaces, the publishers push an update that introduces the malicious code, then inflate their download counts to make them appear legitimate and trustworthy.
Also, artificially increasing download counts can manipulate search results, with the malicious extension appearing higher in the results, often very close to the legitimate projects it impersonates.


Whatever you have to do to get through customs.


Note the lack of anyone concerned about providing medical attention.


Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in three separate corruption cases regarding allegations that he took more than $200,000 from wealthy businessmen in exchange for positive media coverage for himself and his family.
Well that doesn’t make sense.
Turns out those are separate cases. He took money and favorable media coverage in exchange for favors. (allegedly)