

Literally missed the point my comment.
Literally missed the point my comment.
Looks like the original comment has been deleted without leaving a marker
We have backyard chickens. The huge one was a double yoker and delicious 😋
No one should trust cameras. Even at home my house cameras are on their own vlan with no internet. How can professionals not implement something as easy as that.
Are you are it wasn’t the CF-18?
Searching for CF-16 didn’t get me anything but there is a CF-18, been around since the 80s
Isn’t this the same as saying *the government is working against the will of it’s populace"
Oh okay. We shall continue to wait then :)
Whaaaaaaaaat?!
My wife and I were looking forward to this. We played the original together a bunch of times.
Oh well, thanks for sharing, will go look for something else. Damn.
I think both are correct
https://grammarist.com/usage/tartar-or-tartare/
And you know restaurants like to make their menus as “ye olde” as possible with over the top descriptions. So referring to a century old sauce is within norms for that craziness.
Got excited then. But it’s only Aldi US.
But the vast majority of viruses focus on end users.
If the trend continues then maybe the hacker community will start focusing on Linux. Can you imagine “I don’t need a virus scanner, I use Windows, the under dog OS”
I was looking for a looter shooter and tried this out a few months ago.
I found there to be just too much loot. Mobs died and dropped 4+ weapons. I was having to leave stuff behind and get overwhelmed with choice anxiety.
I’ve got the update waiting to be installed. I read the reviews and haven’t installed it. But it nags me every few hours.
I’ve been a Linux sysadmin for decades and Windows for the year 8 years or so. I started using Windows with an air of contempt, and still do. I hate myself for saying this, but Powershell is better than bash. Bash is very limited if you consider only bash. For bash to be useful you need the entire GNU suite with grep, cut, awk etc.
I don’t think this technology is intended to be used for global internet. But for giving access to a remote town, this is many magnitudes lesser in cost than a satellite.
A brief internet search tells me that a Starlink satellite is ~$1 million apiece, and lasts 5 years. With the additional cost of the launch the annual cost is ~$300,000 per year per satellite. You can work out the cost for 10 masts and tell me that its much cheaper.
From a consumer perspective, Starlink is amazing. Fast, relatively cheap, available anywhere. From a labour and material cost, its incredibly expensive. If a town can be serviced by cable, wireless, this new laser or whatever then the economical and environmental impact (in terms of materials) are a fraction.
Whilst masts will face the same prejudice as windmills for destroying landscapes, Starlink has already been causing issues with stargazing and night sky pollution. And this is only the first commercial venture for low-orbit internet. I can imagine there shall eventually be multiple of these setups, each with thousands of satellites (Starlink is at 7k+ now I think) which will only exacerbate the issues.
The point being, that having other technologies with overlapping abilities isn’t a bad thing. Choice is good.
The subnet mask can’t identify anyone, but I guess could be used as part of other metadata like fingerprinting.
How does a service get the subnet mask or MAC of your network/device? It is only exposed to the local network, once the traffic starts it’s journey on the routed internet those details are lost.
Hang on that’s not a fair comparison. So you will need to deploy some masts to reach remote areas, got it.
Satellite internet then needs to fire a satellite into space to cover the area of which now there are thousands of then And the satellite has a shelf life and will eventually burn up in the atmosphere requiring repeated deployments.
Masts sounds easier.
Yeah this. I dunno what the fuss is about. Its just missing on github is all.