I think that only escalates the conflict minimising the probability of a resolve dramatically…

I think what you two need is long honest talk where both parties give their best listening and trying to understand each others feelings and beliefs.

The best method to achieve this is different for any relationship, for some it together at a dire with some beers, for some it is hiking etc. Basically a place where both feel secure and have their privacy together.

No worker should be overworked.

*fixed the Title

I grab only video because I refuse to use shitty streaming tech as well as a uncertain ever changing librarys

You shall not own anything

Exactly! Distributor should not be able to lock you in with exclusive content, this kills the free market of distribution of media

Like now we have competitors fighting against each other for having the best library, but they don’t compete against each other in the case of technology of distribution

For example A disney plus exclusive has a monopol distribution way, there is no competition about how to serve the content. Meaning, there is no incentive to improve distribution. Simple capitalism. Capitalism “works” only in favour of the consumer, as long as the government ensures free market everywhere by regulating too big players who are destroying the whole concept.

If a newcomer can’t enter a market anymore, the market is not free.

I am at step 3, but if you only start piracy when it is already gone, well then it is already gone…

So we have to archive earlier to avoid lost media as well as start seeding earlier to ensure redundancy to avoid lost media

In my opinion, it is very important to give our history of art to the future of humanity. Proactive piracy is the only way to achieve this in times of sudden complete delistings and removal of access to already bought games.

Yea, and it is ultimately Spotify who had an exploit that allowed the circumvention of DRM in the first place.

It is like Spotify is getting paid for having shitty tech that doesn’t do what it supposed to do correctly

Yes, as if they ever get that hypothetical money from Anna 🤣 it is just wasted money

🫢you could order a beer without consent of parents if you are 18

(European Sarcasm)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-sovereign_identity

Is this not good enough?

I understand it like you have to force the user to input a date, but I see no requirement that this date has to be verified by the OS to be correct?

And if a user enters a date less than 18 years ago, another account with a date more than 18 years ago has to verify that date

So, what stops a user who is not 18 just enter an older date?

Each app just uses the date set in OS as verification, which honestly is better than each app having to ask for the date individually…

Don’t understand me wrong, I don’t like age verification at all, I would prefer a bill that forces the possibility to flag a user as “kid” and allow/deny categories like social media, payments, adult content, ads etc.
Like an extension of the admin/user setup we already have

And force websites and apps to respect headers/parameters like “denyCat=adult,social,payments,ads”

Ohh nice 😀 it is so long ago when I last played that 🤯

Gotta get that running on my desktop ASAP to introduce it to my son 🤩

Thank you for the inspiration!

Niiice! Congratulations! 😁

I think there is only one first woman (Lady) 🤔

Offline computing?!

But

Why are they doing that 😅?!

Deliberately making lost media only to sell short time a bit more due to FoMO?

😁

Ohh, i answered to myself

We have policy to have an admin account and a normal business premium (with enterprise windows add-on)

So I enroll them to my main 😂 since we have a hybrid setup, I have like 50 dead objects under my account in intunne (hybrid generets a dead object beside the real one during autopilot)

I just switch the primary user in intune

I found this:

https://github.com/SilentVoid13/SyncDisBoi

And maybe some of these ancient API calls still work

https://github.com/mmai/playlists