I wouldn’t mind the idea of everything going digital. So long as we actually own the digital copies we buy. So long also as we are able to continually access said digital copies. We wouldn’t be having this physical vs digital debate going on for so long, if the practices of what companies like Sony and other media companies have been going about with handling digitally purchased content.

It’s a very stupid easy of a solution that has been continually fumbled time and time again. Because greed got in the way.

  • Steve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Let me try to explain once more.

    The question asks what do you wish was executed better so we’d have it today.

    Your answer is early EVs at the turn of the 20th century.

    My critique is that they executed as well as they could, it still wasn’t good enough.

    Does that make sense now?

    • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 minutes ago

      Your assertion rhat stagnant technology and unsustainable fuel is a better foundation for the automobile industry than dynamic, improvable technology and renewable resources makes the exact same amount of nonsense it did the first time.

      The oil barons applaud your devotion to grime.

      Your answer is early EVs at the turn of the 20th century.

      nope, not at all. read.

      • Steve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        Then nobody knows what you’re talking about. I do it know what to say