• Steve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    So I only have to find one thing Kagi can do, that SearXNG can’t?
    Then what?

    • Melody Fwygon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      SearXNG is probably at the very core of Kagi; with a bunch of extra code and UI on top of it. Bangs work as well as lenses, including external bangs. If you can dream of an engine; you can use it with SearXNG; creating an engine with it is documented well.

      I promise any single thing Kagi can do that SearXNG can’t or won’t; won’t matter. SearXNG is superior to Kagi in every way by cost, and by being free, open source, and functionally all you need.

      • Steve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        So it doesn’t actually matter if Kagi can do something SearXNG can’t.
        It’s cheaper. No argument with that.

      • Zworf@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah I always thought Kagi used that money to build their complete own index.

        Now I hear that their index is only tiny and it’s mostly just delegated searches? Why does it cost so much then?