• @silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        208 days ago

        Yes, a lot of money is spent on things like repairing highways. “Just don’t maintain the bridge” isn’t a good move.

        • @blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -88 days ago

          Its poison for any effort to curb climate change. The concrete production alone is a major source of greenhouse gases, and its being done to further prioritize the single largest source of emissions in the US, personal vehicles. I cant think of a more effective thing to spend money on if the goal is to accelerate climate change.

            • @blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 days ago

              This shit is like clean coal. Its not a thing, concrete production involves releasing the co2 from calcium carbonate, not even mentioning the heating and fuel requirements that go into that process. These highways are going to be built with conventional concrete.

              • @silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                link
                fedilink
                128 days ago

                The problem hasn’t been “you can’t do it” but “architects and engineers don’t have enough experience with it to trust it, so they don’t use it” — a federal government purchasing program can fix that.

                • @blazera@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -38 days ago

                  You literally cant do it, its a chemical reaction that outputs co2. In the same way you cant run a combustion engine without producing co2.

                  • @silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    108 days ago

                    You can use a different chemistry to make a hard substance. There are a ton of options which look good in tests, and pretty much nobody uses them.