thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe end of the Googleversewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1370arrow-down118cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.partytechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1352arrow-down1external-linkThe end of the Googleversewww.theverge.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square118fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.partytechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareCookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down5·1 year agoJust use duck duck go. Its better in all regards.
minus-squareAopen@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year ago Its better in all regards. I wish it was true. My strategy is to use ddg in first try to find something and switch to google when ddg ducks in wrong way. Currently google is better in images and searching for “this particular site” instead of answer on any site
minus-squareWalkableProgrammer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI truly wish this was true. But for work, everything I search on ddg is just not useful
Just use duck duck go. Its better in all regards.
I wish it was true. My strategy is to use ddg in first try to find something and switch to google when ddg ducks in wrong way. Currently google is better in images and searching for “this particular site” instead of answer on any site
I truly wish this was true. But for work, everything I search on ddg is just not useful