thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoThe end of the Googleversewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up1370arrow-down118cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.partytechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1352arrow-down1external-linkThe end of the Googleversewww.theverge.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square120fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.partytechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareCookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down5·2 years agoJust use duck duck go. Its better in all regards.
minus-squareAopen@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years ago Its better in all regards. I wish it was true. My strategy is to use ddg in first try to find something and switch to google when ddg ducks in wrong way. Currently google is better in images and searching for “this particular site” instead of answer on any site
minus-squareWalkableProgrammer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoI truly wish this was true. But for work, everything I search on ddg is just not useful
Just use duck duck go. Its better in all regards.
I wish it was true. My strategy is to use ddg in first try to find something and switch to google when ddg ducks in wrong way. Currently google is better in images and searching for “this particular site” instead of answer on any site
I truly wish this was true. But for work, everything I search on ddg is just not useful