• upstream@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering it costs $67 million just to launch a reusable falcon 9 they’d have to be 100% sure of the outcome to bet on such a thing.

    If not you’re $100+ mill out and still have to replace a €420 million satellite…

    • zhunk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re right that a dedicated Falcon launch would be needed for getting something like a Northrop’s MEV out there, but if the spacecraft was “only” a smallsat with a few commercial arms on board, that might fit on a SpaceX rideshare for a lot less money.

      • upstream@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Geostationary usually doesn’t have too many rides shares if I’m not mistaken. Cost is the launch, not the unused capacity.

        • zhunk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was picturing something boosting itself (or riding a tug) from a rideshare dropoff in LEO. The Transporter missions have all been to SSO, though, so that isn’t super helpful.

          • upstream@beehaw.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Suppose that could be an option. Would need to be big, though, to have enough propellant to get to GEO.