• phillaholic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Find me any place you don’t own that you can store your stuff that has no restrictions on what you can store there.

    • regalia@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something like Proton Cloud, or a self hosted Nextcloud instance. If it’s encrypted, it’s nobody’s business.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not according to their terms of service

        You agree not to use your Account or the Services for any illegal or prohibited activities. Unauthorized activities include, but are not limited to: Disrupting the Company’s networks and Servers in your use of the Services; Accessing/sharing/downloading/uploading illegal content, including but not limited to Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) or content related to CSAM;

        • regalia@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s e2ee, that’s just for them to legally cover their ass. They have zero knowledge of what’s uploaded.

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Proton hasn’t really gotten pushback yet as they are small. If Pedophiles start utilizing Proton for CSAM I guarantee you things will change or they will shut down. Another full e2e provider, can’t recall the name at the moment, just ended up shutting their service down when governments started coming after them. They aren’t the guys from the PirateBay.

            • regalia@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s an attack on e2ee, not on any specific provider. CSAM is just one of the ways they use to criminalize encryption.

              • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s also a real world problem, and positioning yourself as a safe haven for it isn’t going to work. Apple was trying to let you have E2E while simultaneously destroying many Governments main objection to it. Now we are back to square one, and if providers refuse to work with governments, governments will attack E2E encryption.

                • regalia@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I wouldn’t say it’s square one, it currently exists and is usable right now at least. So the laws haven’t won yet. It definitely can be more prevalent though.