• BraBraBra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    If you can’t conveniently travel by train, that is a failure of the design of your city, not trains. If the destination a train took you to was walkable you wouldn’t need a car, because the train could cover the large distances, and you could simply walk from the train to your necessary locations.

      • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Sure, if we can build the infrastructure for cars there, why not trains too. You’re quite closed minded. But also, why can’t you just bike in a village? I mentioned cities because that’s where trains tend to be, genius.

        There’s trams, there’s bikes, there’s buses, etc. etc. etc.