• cookiecutter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    5 months ago

    How creating an account in yet another centralized social media app is going to solve things? Policy might be anti AI now, but what happens if Cara get’s sold and the new company decides to change it? Don’t get me wrong is good that options are popping out to give some fair market share to Meta, but how is Cara sustainable in the long run?

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      but what happens if Cara get’s sold and the new company decides to change it

      Same thing that happens if a federated instance goes bad: you leave?

      • Matomo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        A big difference is that, instead of leaving all content behind because it was only hosted there, you still have a lot of content as only a piece of the federated content disappears (or defederates, or paywalls, w/e)

        • The Doctor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do people seriously not keep copies of their finished work anymore? They just post them and delete the local copy?

          • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s not just about the content posted by individuals though. The community and relationships built on a centralized platform are also at risk to a much greater degree than they would be on federated social media.

    • perishthethought@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree. But I think this an OK idea, until someone makes this with a FOSS platform, in the fediverse. Choices are good.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It also has an expensive back end and no plans for any kind of monetization, so it’s dead in the water from that side too. The moment they’re successful they’re broke.

    • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Anti-AI people tend to be grifters just as much as the people who think AI (in it’s current form) will solve all our problems.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    love the mission and the message, but if i know anything about how things like this go, what it is, is about to die

    EDIT: yeah, their about page says they “filter out generative AI images” without even mentioning how. never mind that with the rate the AI field is advancing, no algorithm for doing that works for more than a couple of months. no word at all on how or even if the photos users upload are going to be protected from scraping.

    i hate to be a cynic, i do, and i can’t wait for this to age poorly but $20 says the website won’t even last a year

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They don’t appear to even have basic protections against ai. They didn’t even get rid of the context menu to download them, and the app shows up in google image search which means google has the thumbnails. It’s a losing battle, if you can see it so can ai, but they could at least but a few speed bumps.

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The whole site seems like a PoC - the accounts don’t even have passwords! (I could actually kinda get on board with this)

        • Nighed@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          they just send a OTP to your email with the idea that you should be keeping your email secure (and that email providers are more secure than they can be)

          • mlaga97@lemmy.mlaga97.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Given how common it is for people to use the ‘reset password’ link for this exact purpose, it does make it seem kinda redundant to even implement passwords on many services to begin with.

  • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I just shared this with my wife because she’s an artist and hates AI as much as I do.

    Apparently she made an account last night.

      • darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, if you don’t copyright everything, then it’s not stealing. We need more open culture, not closed off “IP”.

        • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          The issue there is that we still live in a capitalist hellscape, and artists need to make money to survive. Until we have a situation where artists can make art and not worry about where their rent (yes, fuck landlords) or food, they will need to be able to make a living somehow.

        • Paragone@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You don’t have to do ANYthing in order to have copyright on your images.

          That is standard throughout the Berne convention & has been for decades.

          Registering makes court-cases easier to win, but having copyright on one’s renditions isn’t in any way requiring that one have registered anything with anybody.

          • darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The same way they are now? Copyright is barely a protection for independent artists, and largely serves the interests of big “IP” holders like Disney.