Thanks for the response. So there’s a bunch of stuff to do myself but also surprisingly enough stuff for an editor.
I’ll take a deeper look at it.
Thanks for the response. So there’s a bunch of stuff to do myself but also surprisingly enough stuff for an editor.
I’ll take a deeper look at it.
After reading this, I’m kinda curious how it compares to JetBrains. It’s becoming more and more VSCode like and I’m not a fan.
Does Kate support or have plugins for renaming symbols, presenting documentation, formatting files, showing code diagnostics beyond syntax errors (for example code smells or so), have AI integration (explain this, rewrite this, replace this with prompt output, …), specific framework integrations (reactjs, django, actix, …), and stuff like expanding macros in C/C++ and Rust?
As you said, it’s out of the box/bag. The thing I’ll push for is open sourcing all code. Being able to copy opensource code and hide it in proprietary code is to me the biggest problem. Were everything opensource, I doubt anybody would bat an eye. “You copied my code and put it out there publicly, free of charge? Good. Do it again”.
Personally, I license everything as restrictively as possible for companies and would love an enforcable opensource license that figures out how to make companies contribute back or pay for use of the code.
This feels like a entry worth putting into the wiki (which one will be up to you though 😅
Not specially you, just a comment about the license: OP’s problem with attribution is minor. The major problem they have is that Microsoft took his time to get a personal intro to the project, forked it and didn’t contribute back. That’s what he’s unhappy about. That there was no attribution is barely important.
Yes, choosing MIT doesn’t require hem to contribute back and it should’ve been a restrictive opensource license, but it seems he really thought they asked for a call in order to join in on the development.
Agreed. I wish moderators would ban those people from linux communities and more users would report their elitist behaviour. It’s really annoying to ask a question and get belittled for having the audacity of being ignorant.
I understand these people lack power elsewhere in their lives and want to be powerful where they believe themselves to be experts, but it’s a real pity they express it with a complete lack of empathy. If you don’t want to help, don’t say anything. Let somebody who does want to help nicely do the helping.
Wow, people like you really should be banned from Linux communities for beginners. You’re a detriment to them.
And already the purists are going “if I may interject for a moment” or screaming “reeeee”, as was expected. It’s like they can’t comprehend that the world has changed and that text written 25 years ago doesn’t stay correct, applicable, or right forever.
The pearl clutching gasp of “but this is against scripture” truly never gets old.
Everything has it’s uses. make
is maybe good at incremental builds but is (an)used as a task runner which requires the use of “PHONY” in many places, it has about 6 different ways to declare and use variables all with different gotchas, generally has a convoluted syntax, it doesn’t support different interpreters per task, and lacks a bunch more features. Just explore the feature list and examples that just
has.
It’s simply outdated and mostly lives by the power of defaults and graybeards insisting on its use. Therecs no surprise that things like cmake, nmake, and other tools sprung up to replace it.
I ripped the “met life” shirt off of the snoopy plush and trashed everything else.
Trashing was maybe unnecessary? Could’ve donated it to those in need.
However I do support the sentiment. Fuck Microsoft. Hopefully you’ll be able to find employment that is more fulfilling and less genocidal. (This is not a stab at you, I get working for an evil company and wanting to get away from it).
All of those look goofy af compared to just.
Would be great if the patents were invalided, but the bigger issue would be them being accepted in the first place. That shouldn’t even work.
If this does go to court because the patents are considered valid and they can successfully argue that they don’t apply, I’m afraid Nintendo could just hand-craft another patent. They would have been given instructions the recipe during the court proceedings.
But I do wonder if PocketPair could just default on the lawsuit in the US. What kind of effect would that have?
That amazing experience of having to print out instructions at a friends house to recover a dual-boot system after either grub fucked up or windows XP fucked up. Good times.
Is this how they plan to make money too? Demand 15 bucks to be verified, 2k/year to be a verification issuer? This is going to be fun to watch.
I can’t find documentation about that unfortunately 🧐 There’s woodpecker-cli exec
but after testing that on the example pipeline, it does nothing even with verbose logging.
Do you have a functional example somewhere?
What if they pull in a new dependency with a CVE or that executes malicious code? How am I supposed to check that? Or what if I miss a bug in the justfile or shell script?
Do you have a link to that? There’s a blog entry “Earthly Switches to Open-source” From July 2023. Are they undoing that?
After perusing the docs, this looks more like it. Thank you. I’ll just have to explore how it can be combined with projects that use nix and those that don’t. My biggest issue with CIs has always been caching, but as the saying goes “there are 2 hard problems in computer science…”
Or, put target in RAM with cargo-ramdisk. Just don’t get yourself an overpriced Mac and pay for extra RAM instead. Save your SSD, stop worrying about rust clutter at the same time, and give a company money that won’t lock you in and give your money to Trump. Win win win.
Anti Commercial-AI license