Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square694fedilinkarrow-up11.32Karrow-down1207cross-posted to: yimby@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1image[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?lemmy.worldFried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square694fedilinkcross-posted to: yimby@lemmy.world
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·1 year agoIt’s the only option though. Bulldozing nature to build more cheap low density housing is not a viable plan.
minus-squareAdmiralShat@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIf it were the only option, it would be happening more. Just because the other options are bad doesn’t mean very much. They’re still happening.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoIt’s literally banned in most of the US, that’s why it’s not happening more.
![[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f6ec67a5-2636-4875-8dd4-fa5241a3083c.jpeg){kind=link}
It’s the only option though. Bulldozing nature to build more cheap low density housing is not a viable plan.
If it were the only option, it would be happening more.
Just because the other options are bad doesn’t mean very much. They’re still happening.
It’s literally banned in most of the US, that’s why it’s not happening more.