It’s about time that Intuit was called out for their scam. Hopefully, the attempt to stop the federal tax filing will get dismissed as well.

  • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love how it’s gone so far beyond “We would like to assist people in paying their taxes.”

    “We would like to prevent the US government from examining the possibility of creating it’s own online tax filing portal.”

    “We would like to advertise our product as free using government channels and grants only to then turn around after the user has input their most sensitive data into our database and attempt to wring them for $100.00 or not be bound by our privacy policy.”

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Feels like every Evil Corporation ™ has gone this route. In ye olden days it used to be a competitive market where businesses tried to provide the best product and services for the best prices. Then at some point everyone collectively decided to start doing as little as possible without getting sued. I’m so sick of it.

      Regarding tax compliance for individuals, if you have the slightest complications in your financial situation, it might be best to pay a small time preparer $500 to deal with the hassle. Software isn’t cheap these days so might as well pay a small premium for the better service a pro provides. (Disclaimer: I am a pro so my opinion is biased.)

      • bakachu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree, would rather my money went to a local firm with an actual person who I can consistently contact for questions. Did this a few years ago for an especially challenging tax year. Absolutely 0 regrets - if I had done it via self-serve software I would’ve missed out on quite a few unknown tax assists that the accountant found.

      • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was in the specific moment that tort reform limited damages to 250,000 because they blamed an old Lady for getting burned by her 170° coffee. Though she was awarded like 7.6 million as an additive damage because.mcdonalds had been gently warned several times before

        • solstice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why, because it’s cheaper to get sued for a few bucks than to not be a shitty company? Interesting. Like Ed Norton’s car recall equation in Fight Club. Got a source? Not challenging you but I’m curious if that’s your opinion or a known concept.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every time you see a post like this, remember that one of your elected officials lined their pockets to fuck the entire country for generations ahead

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      You left out the best part… The amount is often extremely low. Just a few grand to the old PAC that directly feeds their campaign which is just a slush fund for their personal use.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you’re the kind of person to do this, the number doesn’t matter. It’s the fact that you will get away with it

    • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why wouldn’t they when they can do it without any fear of retribution? The worst they get is some angry comments from internet randoms.

  • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember one time I spent an hour filing taxes, I accidentally hit a premium option, it literally didn’t let me go back to free. On top of that it kept piling on charges. Fuck intuit. Thieving pieces of shit.

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      HRBlock is the same.

      I refused to use them ever again after they tried to charge me $300 when it was listed as “free”

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    Intuit is not your friend or ally, or anyone you want to do business with, or have an account on their many myriad of financial web sites, which they are gobbling up all the time

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like this might be a good time to plug the IRS Free File Program. It’s a program that allows lower-income people to file their tax returns for free. While the program has been gutted in recent years by companies like Intuit leaving the program to either stop offering their services for free or to start offering a “free” alternative, it’s still viable. I used it last year to file my taxes.

  • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should have been forced to do it the other way. “You advertise as free, so you have to provide this for free.”

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck the politicians that allow this shit to exist. Good on this move, but to be clear, it’s the same folks who enabled it.

  • bakachu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use TurboTax ina free way - calculate all my taxes using their amazing software and then when the numbers match on the free site, I file there. That’s the beauty of TurboTax that you can exploit. I feel it’s fair game knowing they make the software open and then trick people who have calculated everything out to pay a ridiculous amount for the filing fee at the end.

  • Chloyster [She/Her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Intuit will appeal this groundless and seemingly predetermined decision by the FTC to rule in its own favor and is confident that when the matter ultimately returns to a neutral body Intuit will prevail, as it has previously in this matter,” the company said.

    Lmao

  • Thom Gray@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Services provided by for profit corporations are almost never truly free. It usually means “free” in exchange for access to your user data or “free” if you watch these advertisements. That’s not free, it’s an exchange of your data that’s valuable for resell to a company or your time to watch their ads.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The initial decision by Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell was released today and is subject to an automatic review by the full commission.

    Moreover, if an Intuit good or service is not free for most US taxpayers, that fact must be “disclosed clearly and conspicuously at the outset of any disclosures required” by the order.

    The ruling said that “Intuit had removed several of the most plausibly deceptive advertisements—that is, three videos that repeated the word ‘free’ a dozen or more times over 30 seconds before a very brief disclaimer.”

    “However, if Intuit resumes its full advertising campaign… or the facts on the ground change significantly, the FTC may return to this Court to request relief,” US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote.

    In its response to the administrative law judge’s decision, Intuit said it expected the ruling because of the FTC’s “flawed and highly questionable process, Chair Lina Khan’s previous public and prejudicial statements against Intuit, and the fact that the FTC has ruled in its own favor in nearly every consumer protection case for the last two decades.”

    “We believe the FTC’s decision is improper, wholly ignores the facts, and tramples on the foundations of an independent American judicial system with its serving as prosecutor, judge, and jury on its own matters,” Intuit said.


    The original article contains 860 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!