• Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    You gonna force everyone into dense cities and make them walk or do you know of some new transportation techniques that will allow people outside of city center to ditch all their cars?

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Go look at small towns in Europe and the fucking trains they have. Then weep when your city 100 times the size has worse public transportation than them.

      You don’t need to live in a big fucking city for public transportation, you just need a government that fucking cares.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once upon a time, the US was the birthplace of the labor movement, fighting for labor rights like the 40 hour week and overtime pay. And now, the US is one of the most anti-labor countries in the developed world. When cars were first introduced, there were anti-car protests in US cities. It took decades of brainwashing by the car industry for Americans to feel that cars “make them American”.

          Culture can change. It starts when people recognize how bad it is to depend on cars and demand better options.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Beware of any history that makes the current state of affairs seem inevitable. There are always countervailing forces.

              There are dozens of articles if you do a search online, but here is one article from Bloomberg.

              Americans have grown up with versions of the “car culture” thesis: This is a nation that simply likes cars, and this preference is the biggest factor in the extent of car domination. Maybe clever marketing and interest group lobbying has something to do with this (the thesis concedes), and maybe the preference is not rational; still, we prefer cars, even in settings that are poorly suited to them, and even to the point of putting up with their high financial, social, environmental, and safety costs. All over America in the 1950s and 1960s, residents, particularly women, organized demonstrations against car traffic.

              Anti-car protests were successful in places like New York City and Vancouver, Canada, which is why they are some of the only places in North America without highways cutting through them. San Francisco also had major protests, but highways were forced through anyways.

        • Hobo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People might laugh or discount your comment, and you might’ve made it in jest, but that’s probably one of the biggest hurdles that the anti-car crowd refuses to take seriously. Americans love cars, and a lot of Americans for sure love gigantic monstrosity tricked out cars. We have songs about trucks, guns, and Jesus, and you can bet your ass those things are the same level of special for a lot of people.

          I personally would love to see viable public transportation, but you’re going to have to change culture which isn’t as easy as, “We built some nice trains and buses! Now everyone use those instead!” You’re going to have to convince the gun toting, Jesus loving, jacked up Ford F-450 Super Duty owners to give up a huge piece of their personality. And from what I can tell that hasn’t been working out so great with guns. Maybe we can write a nice country songs about riding trains and buses? We used to have a few of those.

      • icedterminal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the difference. The government doesn’t have the desire, or the people don’t vote in favor. In some cases, they don’t even have the money.

      • LaLiLuLuCo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hi I live in a small European town and still need a car. It’s not the gotcha you think it is. The busses and trains are neat for young healthy people with one backpack. Turns out I don’t go out and need one back pack of stuff.

        I’m moving back to the US because of the massive labor shortage and that shutting down your economy on Sundays is discriminatory towards non Christians.

        The train doesn’t alleviate a ton of other car needs in daily life.

        Oh also my packages and my garbage don’t get delivered or taken away reliably in large part because the roads are too narrow. Fuck this. I end up needing to drive anyway.

        I would rather have good car infrastructure than the ability to back pack around. It massively influences my quality of life. If I need a car once a week I’m going to use my car more than that and I have a lot more options once I’m doing so.

        Edit : just got told I need to go to the next town over to get a covid test. I can either hang out at the bus stop or train station for an hour sick af, then walk a bunch, to get a test. Or I could drive.

      • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact you’re comparing small European towns built off rail stops to sprawling American cities with 100x the population says more than enough about your argument

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fact you don’t realize basically every American city was once a rail stop says enough about your intelligence.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, the idea that this is only possible in dense cities is a myth. Look at the town planning of small rural communities in the US established before the dominance of cars. They are way more walkable and bikable than most modern developments. People living in small towns probably still need to own a car, but they don’t need to use one nearly as much.

      This artificial division between super high density cities where public transportation is possible and super low density suburbs where you must have a car is also a very North American mindset. There are small towns and villages throughout Europe and Asia serviced by buses and trains, and with plenty of biking and pedestrian infrastructure. Cars aren’t inevitable, we just seem to be unable or unwilling to imagine anything else.

    • mayo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like we shouldn’t be arguing with each other about this stuff? It’s like class conflict, wrong enemy.