SUMMARY

  • The EU has identified WhatsApp as a gatekeeper in the messaging industry and has given it a few months to enable interoperability with other apps.
  • The EU’s Digital Markets Act aims to promote fair competition and give consumers more options for alternative services.
  • WhatsApp has already begun working on interoperability with other apps, potentially allowing smaller players like Signal to compete more fairly.
  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Signal will soon be your one stop solution for all your chat apps

    Fixed that for you.

  • elouboub@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is this being presented as “whatsapp will be the one and only” instead of “whatsapp won’t be the only option”? The DMA will users to install nearly any chat app and chat with users from another chat app.

    • Kayn@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Where are you getting “the one and only” from? Are you misinterpreting “one-stop solution”?

  • TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that iMessage got the exemptions underpins the entire act. I would any day switch to Signal, if there is 1:1 interoperability b/w the platforms.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t wait for signal/session/simplex to be whatsapp compatible, but I’m not sure they can provided the e2ee gurantees since whatsapp is closed source.

    • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I fear that Signal won’t implement cross compatibility for WhatsApp since they already said that they are not a fan of potentially giving up E2EE to get it to work. And I can understand that but I still really would like to have the cross compatibility.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope Signal doesn’t if it won’t be E2EE. I like knowing that if it’s in Signal, it’s E2EE, and being able to tell less technically sophisticated people to whom I recommend Signal that everything in it is secure against eavesdropping.

    • Tomrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Signal and also lots of other privacy focused messenger-services (threema e.g.) already said the will not implement this forced interoperability since it will lower their already high standards regarding their users privacy. Sad but i guess it makes sense :(

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So users of those apps will have to install the even less secure apps to converse with “normies”. Great move.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure they can provided the e2ee gurantees since whatsapp is closed source.

      Uh, news flash: Signal and Meta are business partners and WhatsApp (just as Facebook Messenger) uses Signal’s encryption:

      The ability to sell proprietary versions of Signal libraries is literally the reason for Signal’s Contributor License Agreement: https://signal.org/cla/

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s still closed source, so we can’t make guarantees about WhatsApp conversation participants.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          so we can’t make guarantees about WhatsApp conversation participants.

          “We” can’t but Signal, who work on WhatApp’s source code, can: https://signal.org/blog/there-is-no-whatsapp-backdoor/

          tldr: When contacts have verified each other, communication is secure.

          If you think that Signal can’t be trusted, you should not use their client either.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            signal may have given a fully vetted and correct implementation to whatsapp, but because its closed source we don’t know if it has changed, or if its really implemented on all conversations.

            It changes the trust model of conversation participants.

            To answer your query, if signal was closed source, I wouldn’t trust it either.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              signal may have given a fully vetted and correct implementation to whatsapp

              They were not “given” it. They are literally the contractor who worked on that: “Over the past year, we’ve been progressively rolling out Signal Protocol support for all WhatsApp communication across all WhatsApp clients.” –https://signal.org/blog/whatsapp-complete/

              but because its closed source we don’t know if it has changed, or if its really implemented on all conversations.

              I’m not an encryption developer. I can’t vet this for Signal’s own app either.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                …and because its closed source, community cryptography developers and researchers can’t vet it for you either. That is the core issue, its not about trust.

                It’s about capabilities that inform the threat model, and the exposure model.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s weird. With every single app having a DM feature years before Whatsapp was even invented, with every single cell phone having email and SMS capabilities, and with a bunch of E2E encrypted apps already in service, why would I want to go back to Facebook’s ecosystem in 2023?

    • heird@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whatsapp worked on iPhone, Android, Blackberry and even some old ass java phones

      They dominated the market in most countries or were close second to Messenger.

      Now they keep growing and it doesn’t give any chance to smaller better apps, this law makes it possible for you to use only signal but also chat to people that only use Whatsapp

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      When every single person you know uses Whatsapp, you have to use it too. That’s what this law is about. So you can use other apps even if everyone else uses whatsapp

    • jackoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably won’t. WhatsApp is already huge. Threads was a new platform with artificially inflated user numbers.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why though? To avoid users leaving Signal for Whatsapp? if you need to chat with someone through matrix into whatsapp, right now you laready have whatsapp installed. I prefer to talk to whatsapp users from a more secure app, thanks.

  • severien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone know what level of interoperability is required? Like basic text, pictures, emoji… or every feature including things like location sharing?

    • colonial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Full Unicode text and images is likely all we’ll get, but honestly I never understood the appeal of all the crap they stuff into (say) iMessage.

      • severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know iMessage, but some of the more advanced features in WhatsApp/Messenger are great. I use shared location almost daily, voice messages are great too.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good question. Because it could end up like the interoperability of MSN Messenger and Yahoo Messenger of the early 2000’s. It was crap.

  • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a whatsapp because my dad wanted to be able to call me without international long distance fees. He’s called once and I get endless amounts of spam. I’ll be seeing him in a couple of weeks, and I can hopefully switch him to LINE (what everyone uses here) and get rid of this app for all and get the last cancer of Meta out of my personal life.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really? I’ve gotten almost no spam in the last decade or so I’ve been using it. The one time I did, I think the account had been hacked.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Back at you with whatsapp too. I still dislike it but not because it generates spam, at all. Do you mean that you get messaged by spammers though whatsapp? I only use it to chat with family memebers and I have no issues with notifications or anything. Maybe I have blocked some notifications but you can do it too.

          • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I get tons of random messages from people I don’t know. A couple are recruiters who are finding my number on my CV, but most are just “hi sweety, do you have time to talk?” from random numbers all over the world.

            • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Huh, that means that your phone number was sold to call centers. There’s a thing called the robison list in europe, idk if it works worldwide, where if you put your phone number in that list call centers can’t legally call you. I’ve recieved zero spam since I put my number in that list, but it seems surprising that recruiters are contacting you through Whatsapp instead of calling you, emailing you or just sending you a message through LinkedIn, that’s seems excessively aggressive.

              Damn, I don’t really have a solution besides marking them all as spam, but new numbers will keep coming so idk if there is a good solution, sadly. Just a note though, if you are receiving that much spam through whatsapp is noe because it’s whatsapp specifically, it’s because it’s the most used app in europe and spammers try to contact numbers from their list though the common apps by default.

    • jack@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      WhatsApp is fundamentally bad and anti-consumer because it is proprietary. When people are not allowed to understand, change and redistribute the source code, the people will ALWAYS be milked and abused in some way. Trust me. LINE is also closed source and unfree, so it would only be a matter of time until that company fucks you up and you want to switch to another messenger. The most popular open source/ free messenger would be Signal. Conceptually the most promising one in my opinion is SimpleX Chat, if you want to be a bit more adventurous

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one I know is going to change to those. LINE also has other business stuff built in for interacting with companies (customer service for my massage place, my dentist, etc.) In an ideal world, sure, but it isn’t going to happen.

        • Gamey@feddit.rocks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a similar issue but I am able to use SMS for those few people, most of them are relatively easy to convince of Singla in my experience, it’s as easy as it gets, basically whatsapp in secure!

  • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck that, fuck them they belong in the digital bin. I don’t want WhatsApp to be able to connect to Signal or anything else. Sounds like a gigantic security risk.