That’s not true at all.
My gf has awful logical reasoning skills. Which leads to her being wrong on many small arguments that can easily be proved with simple logic.
There is no amount of reasoning that will make her change her mind. So in the end, she is always right because there is no other option. That is incredibly frustrating and I end up being neither “right” nor happy.
I don’t understand your conclusion.
Yes, Manhattan distance exists, it has a name. But I don’t understand how having a name makes it faster “a straight line distance” also has a name, euclidean distance. And always euclidean ≤ Manhattan.
So if on both routes you go at the same speed, it is faster to take the one of the euclidean distance.
The windows crate is full of Deref. Because the windows API is full of inheritance.
It may not be what the trait was thought of for, but I’m glad we have it to interface with APIs that have actual inheritance.
But if I have to make an Array I have to inherit from Indexable which inherits from Collection which inherits from Object! How else am I supposed to implement an Array?
How many of those 8 hours are because bit bucket is down? I’d bet at least 1. I swear their uptime is measured in 8s instead of 9s (as in 88.88, not 99.88)
I used to. Yes
I used to be shoes on.
You just wake up, put on underwear, pants, shirt, socks and shoes, in that order.
This service is for people that use the same password everywhere. It makes no sense for someone that uses a different password per site.
You enter your password in thousands of websites. Why is this one different?
I fell like the disclaimer should really be at the top. Specially because it is very geographically dependant and this is the internet.
I don’t think you can qualify any trump scandal as an “earthquake”. Earthquakes move things around. USAians would still vote for trump.
Deref works on top of encapsulation though. Inheritance syntactically hides the encapsulation, with Deref it’s in the clear.
It’s true that it feels like inheritance, but I’m grateful for it. Otherwise it would be a pain to use the windows API.
I know this thread is old. But I disagree with you.
I agree that depending on how you use a debugger, some race conditions might not happen.
However, I don’t agree that debuggers are useless to fix race conditions.
I have a great example that happened to me to prove my point:
As I was using a debugger to fix a normal bug, another quite strange unknown bug happened. That other bug was indeed a race condition. I just never encountered it.
The issue was basically:
And so handling the session start and session end at the same time resulted in a bug. It was more complicated than this (we do use mutexes) but it was along those lines.
We develop in a lab-like condition with fast networking and computers, so this issue cannot happen on its own. But due to the breakpoint I put in the session initiation function, I was able to observe it. But in a real world scenario it is something that may happen.
Not only that, I could reproduce the “incredibly rare” race condition 100% of the time. I just needed to place a breakpoint in the correct place and wait for some amount of time.
Could this be done without a debugger? Most of the time yes, just put a sleep call in there. Would I have found this issue without a debugger? Not at all.
An even better example:
Deadlocks.
How do you fix a deadlock? You run the program under a debugger and make the deadlock happen. You then look at which threads are waiting at a lock call and there’s your answer. It’s as simple as that.
How do you print-debug a deadlock? Put a log before and after each lock in the program and look at unpaired logs? Sounds like a terrible experience. Some programs have thousands of lock calls. And some do them at tens of times per second. Additionally, the time needed to print those logs changes the behaviour of the program itself and may make the deadlock harder to reproduce.
4k is noticeable in a standard pc.
I recently bought a 1440p screen (for productivity, not gaming) and I can fit so much more UI with the same visual fidelity compared to 1080p. Of course, the screen needs to be physically bigger in order for the text to be the same size.
So if 1080p->1440p is noticeable, 1080p->4k must be too.
Good rule of thumb. As long as it’s not followed blindly of course.
Structs with lifetimes are often quite convenient. Especially for performance.
Well that’s because it isn’t lol.
My guess is, if the USA method was better:
The USA would sanction countries until they adopted it. They would embed it in the national flag and insert it in the national anthem. They would make underwear out of it and put stickers on their 20yard-long cars.
No. The problem is that kids have nothing else to do. The only fun thing left is the phone.
They can’t go alone and play out there, they may get hit by a car or their parents might get in trouble. They have to always be supervised by an adult, but there are almost no places with adults to watch for the kids, they have to bring their dedicated parent. And parents have to work way too many hours, they don’t have time to watch the kid play for all the time the kid needs to play.
Furthermore, everything that is fun to kids is illegal. “No skating here”, “no playing with a ball here”. Where can kids play? They don’t have a car to go to a remote place where playing is allowed. They should have areas where they can play relatively close to home.
And I say this as a European. In America all these problems are 10x worse, I can’t imagine what that would do to a kid. Maybe the suburbanites can play in their lawns. But the ones in cities are out of luck.