Sorry for the poor quality / lack of screenshot, this is from my work computer which I isolate from my personal devices, so I just took a picture.

  • nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m gonna have to say that Google is correct in this case. Use uBlock Origin instead.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The malware on your system is Chrome.

    Expecting an advertising company to have your interests in mind (you are the nothing but eyeballs they are delivering to their customers) is the hight of naivety.

    • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s okay, ignore that this is actually a shitty extension and Google is correct, and use the time to rant and soapbox about unrelated crap.

      • jasep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe you’re right about the soapbox, but OP didn’t say anything inaccurate. Google is actively pushing to have more ads shown in Chrome wherever they can. The author of UbO even advocates for Firefox being the best experience regarding ads.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        we are on a privacy sub. Everything I said is relevant to privacy.

        So, in the nicest possible way. Pull your head in.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone keeps saying to use ublock origin. However, there is a better way. Just use invidious.

    Also that extension is malious

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, UbO works perfectly. I have zero QOL complaints. It literally blocks every single banner ad and video ad on every single website.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it your still visiting a website that doesn’t respect your freedom. That’s why I suggested invidious

        • intrepid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get what you’re saying. But remember - invidious is just another frontend to the same website that doesn’t care about your freedom. Now you are blocking at a server, instead of blocking in your browser. If you care about freedom, then you must leave that abusive service behind.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t use Chrome then. There are plenty of browsers using the Chromium open source platform. So if you like how Chrome behaves but don’t like Google, use one of the Chromium-based systems.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you use chrome you might as well go full corporate bootlick and not use any blockers at all

  • emptyother@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To all you uBlock Origin fans: Any reason why nobody ever recommend AdGuard over uBlock Origin? Anything questionable about it? Or is it just that uBlock is well-known?

    • Skimmer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      AdGuard being ran by a for-profit company and some of the functionality being locked behind a paywall probably doesn’t help its case compared to uBlock Origin, though AdGuard is definitely the next best option currently. I also just find uBlock Origin supports more advanced features.

      (Edit: Apparantly the paywall only applies to the Safari extension and their desktop app, but not the extension on most platforms, see the reply below, my other points still stand)

      • emptyother@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also just find uBlock Origin supports more advanced features.

        Googling it and according to one answer the only difference between uBlock Origin and AdGuard browser extensions is that uBlock has a feature where they can hide stuff instead of completely blocking it. Two comments said AdGuard was the more techy one, and most users would prefer uBlock Origin because of that. A bunch of comments are people who obviously havent tried them both. Some are confusion about the difference between AdGuard desktop program and AdGuard browser extensions.

        Maybe better if I just test it for myself.

        some of the functionality being locked behind a paywall

        The entire desktop app, yes. That does DNS blocking. Not the browser extensions, no blocked features there.

        • Skimmer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Googling it and according to one answer the only difference between uBlock Origin and AdGuard browser extensions is that uBlock has a feature where they can hide stuff instead of completely blocking it.

          Does AdGuard have anything equivalent to uBlock Origin’s advanced blocking modes? That’s mainly what I meant by “advanced features”.

          The entire desktop app, yes. That does DNS blocking. Not the browser extensions, no blocked features there.

          I know their Safari extension has some blocked functionality without paying, but fair enough, it may be different for other platforms, I’ll edit my reply then. Thanks for the correction. I stand by the other point though, I think uBlock Origin has an inherent advantage and added trust by being non-profit and fully community driven vs. AdGuard being ran by a for-profit company.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t AdGuard just DNS? That means it blocks ads from everywhere, not just the browser. But you can’t customise the blocklist unless you selfhost it.

      If there’s a web extension too, then idk. If you use say, Firefox for Android, then you don’t have much choice besides uBlock, and with… Hm, other mobile browsers you don’t have any at all.

      • emptyother@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you use say, Firefox for Android, then you don’t have much choice besides uBlock,

        Or AdGuard. I run the AdGuard browser extension on my Firefox for Android. It claims to also have one for iOS Safari. It has a paid desktop app, and that one add DNS blocks. I tried it once and paid for a license, but then I switched back to the free browser extensions for a reason I dont remember anymore.

        • emptyother@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          switched back to the free browser extensions for a reason I dont remember anymore.

          I remember now. It caused havok with a lot of UWP apps. So I went to browser-extensions only.

      • DuckGuy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t AdGuard just DNS?

        It isn’t “just” DNS level blocking, no. They have an adblocker for browsers, too. uBlock is using their filters.

        other mobile browsers you don’t have any at all

        Some have built-in adblockers (ex: Brave, DDG), others support extensions (ex: Safari, Orion).

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      uBlock Origin is FOSS.

      Edit: AdGuard is FOSS too, for some reason I never even consider the possibility of AdGuard been FOSS

  • Lord_ToRA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sorry for the poor quality / lack of screenshot, this is from my work computer which I isolate from my personal devices, so I just took a picture.

    You easily could have found a way to transfer a screenshot while keeping your “devices isolated” (e.g. email), or just could have uploaded it to an image host and posted that link. You can do better in the future.

    Also, it is worth investigating whether or not the extension actually contains malware instead of just jumping to the conclusion “Google bad” and ignoring the red flag.

    • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Conservation of effort. I debated whether or not you were worth a response, but

      you can do better in the future

      You are a penis. Goodbye.