return2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year agoJamie Dimon says employees can go work somewhere else if they don't like long commutes into the office, thinks remote work doesn't cut itwww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkJamie Dimon says employees can go work somewhere else if they don't like long commutes into the office, thinks remote work doesn't cut itwww.businessinsider.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThat rewards employees for living as far away from the office as possible. Is that a fair thing to do? I seriously don’t know.
minus-squareLoom In Essence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoyou’re right, let’s scrap offices altogether and wfh 100%
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSomething tells me there might be a middle ground here.
minus-squareSuperDuper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHere’s a radical idea: just let each employee decide if and when they work from home or in the office.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m not sure why you’re talking to me like I’m suggesting some sort of crazy thing when I wasn’t even making any suggestions…
minus-squareSuperDuper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI’m not? You said there must be a middle ground between incentivizing a forced RTO vs scrapping offices altogether and I presented one.
minus-squareMadgePickles@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoSometimes you just gotta pick someone to reply to the whole conversation going on
minus-squareBrainsploosh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoNot rewards, incentivises, means the employer has a larger labor pool to pick from, which in capitalism is good.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBut isn’t making commutes longer a bad thing? Especially for the planet? And this is encouraging it.
minus-squareBrainsploosh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoCapitalism in general is bad for the planet
That rewards employees for living as far away from the office as possible. Is that a fair thing to do? I seriously don’t know.
you’re right, let’s scrap offices altogether and wfh 100%
Something tells me there might be a middle ground here.
Here’s a radical idea: just let each employee decide if and when they work from home or in the office.
I’m not sure why you’re talking to me like I’m suggesting some sort of crazy thing when I wasn’t even making any suggestions…
I’m not? You said there must be a middle ground between incentivizing a forced RTO vs scrapping offices altogether and I presented one.
Sometimes you just gotta pick someone to reply to the whole conversation going on
Not rewards, incentivises, means the employer has a larger labor pool to pick from, which in capitalism is good.
But isn’t making commutes longer a bad thing? Especially for the planet? And this is encouraging it.
Capitalism in general is bad for the planet