Ex-Sony Computer Entertainment Europe president Chris Deering does not believe recent layoffs across the games industry have been a result of corporate greed. Instead, workers who have lost their jobs should “drive an Uber” or “go to the beach for a year” until employment settles.

Deering was a guest on games writer Simon Parkin’s podcast My Perfect Console, where the pair discussed games industry layoffs.

“I don’t think it’s fair to say that the resulting layoffs have been greed,” said Deering. “I always tried to minimise the speed with which we added staff because I always knew there would be a cycle and I didn’t want to end up having the same problems that Sony did in Electronics.”

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    Can all these execs just fuck off and die already? Or at the very least never say anything, at all. Ever.

  • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    7 days ago

    just go to the beach for a year.

    I am advocating violence against this man. This post is a call to violence.

  • voracitude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    7 days ago

    Perfectly reasonable statements made by an individual very much in-tune with the video game development community and its members.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 days ago

    C-Suite pay precludes equitable worker pay. They are always lying through their teeth.

    The fact that CEO compensation has grown far faster than the pay of the top 0.1% of wage earners indicates that CEO compensation growth does not simply reflect a competitive race for skills (the “market for talent”) that also increases the value of highly paid professionals more generally. Rather, the growing pay differential between CEOs and top 0.1% earners suggests the growth of substantial economic rents (income not related to a corresponding growth of productivity) in CEO compensation. CEO compensation, it appears, does not reflect the greater productivity of executives but the specific power of CEOs to extract concessions.

    https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-in-2021/

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Totally tracks with the idea that the eventual destination here isn’t capitalism, it’s actually worse than that…it’s fucking neofeudalism.

      They don’t want to produce a better product than the competitors, they want to extract rents from anyone unlucky enough to need to use the tools or knowledge in their fiefdom, and they want to use those rents to buy up more tools and knowledge to charge rents on.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean, rent seeking is the best case scenario for a capitalist. You just insert yourself in the supply chain without much investment and get money for simply being in the chain.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          You’re right that every capitalist wants to be a landlord, but the distinction between the two groups is that capitalists aren’t there yet, and capitalists are largely also subjected to rents by those that already are.

          A lot of the recent movements in software has been away from selling products and toward rents (i.e. away from capitalism and toward neofeudalism / technofeudalism). That is why everything has become a subscription service (even things that you used to pay once and be able to use as is until you wanted to “upgrade” like, for instance, Adobe Photoshop).

          Doctorow explains the difference in this clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-Tl6yIsCoY

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I see the nuance you are making now and I agree.

            SaaS does feel like technofeudalism where you pay but don’t own shit, a bit like fiefs working in the field and giving wheat in exchange for a land that they don’t own.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s amazing how incentives at high levels can absolutely twist someone.

    Rather than discuss or investigate the situations that lead to these hire/fire cycles, potentially find a better way, they accept it as inevitable and build off of that.

    They get to take the lazy route and still have room to internally satisfy their withered conscience that they are somehow “doing good” by making vague attempts to offset the shit situation, rather than trying to eliminate said situation entirely.

    Fucking hell why does this explain so much of the bullshit I am dealing with at work right now?

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      At some point, companies completely absolved themselves of a large part of their purpose…which is to provide employment.

    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      It doesn’t hurt them. Why the hell should they care? Their massive bonuses go through whether Dave gets to give presents to his kids this year or not!

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is the most out of touch bullshit I’ve heard in a long while. Normally I’d ask you kindly to go fuck yourself, but that seems a little too nice.

  • itsathursday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    “But I gave you a job in the first place, what made you think you could keep it? I’ll call you when I need you geez”