• blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Building genuinely secure computer systems is incredibly difficult. You might even be in systems/software and be thinking “yeah it is hard”, but to be really secure it’s 1000x harder than that. So everything you use off the shelf from any vendor is a massive compromise and has holes in it. But on the other hand most people don’t need really secure systems.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Isn’t a true air gap pretty solid though? Aside from someone actually coming into your house and interfacing directly it would be pretty hard to bypass, or am I on Mt. Dunning-Kruger over here this time?

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You are correct.

        The uncomfortable part is what I’ve learned about the challenges to gain physical access.

        Most physical security is equally appalling to most Cybersecurity.

        Edit: Incredibly unfun exercise: pick a physical security device you rely on, personally, and do a YouTube search for “device name break in test”. I’ve rarely been able to find a video more than 3 minutes long, for any product, at all. And the actual breaking is usually mere seconds in the middle bit.