Kagi is a paid alternative to ad-supported search engines like Google and DuckDuckGo. It has recently revised its pricing model, reducing the cost for a plan with unmetered searches from $25 per month to $10.

Kagi boasts the following (and more) features:

  • Blocking or boosting specific domains in your search results
  • “Lenses”, which are individual setting profiles (e.g. region locks, domain whitelists) that can be applied to search queries
  • All of the Bangs that DuckDuckGo has (e.g. type “!yt” in front of your query to immediately search on youtube.com)
  • Universal Summarizer, which works with any website, PDF document, YouTube video and more

This blog post goes into full details about Kagi’s capabilities.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why the hell would you pay for search when the free competitors are just better

    Also it’s automatically not private when it requires a login. They know exactly what user is searching what, and basically breaks search in incognito mode. Also people love more accounts to manage.

    “If it’s free then you’re the product” isn’t even true when search engines are ad supported, so stick with the much better free alternatives.

    If you really want to pay while not having to login, self-host a searx instance and you’ll be logging your own data. You’ll have complete control, it’s significantly cheaper, and it’s far more private without having to even login.

    • snaggen@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No ads disguised as search results. Actually, no ads at all. Great search results. Lenses.

      Also, there is a solution for incognito mode. And ad supported, in practice means tracked by advertisers, and hence you are the product.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        DDG proves literally all of that false. Also just use AdBlock with it. Elaborate on it working in private browsing without needing to login.

        • lloram239@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          DDG is just a wrapper around Bing and substantially worse than Google, smaller index and less up to date. Not needing a login doesn’t really guarantee you anything either, as they still can identify you by IP or device finger print if they want to. You basically have to trust their marketing that they don’t do that.

          What makes Kagi interesting is that it’s actually right up there with Google in terms of results, while surpassing it in terms of features. Would I pay $10/month for Kagi? Nope. It’s good, but not magic. It’s still just regular Internet search and you’ll find most of what it finds with other search engines as well, especially when you hop between multiple. But if you want a better search engine and have the money, Kagi does feel like an upgrade, which the other alternatives just don’t.

        • syl@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          DDG has ads in the search result. Laginis honestly a great service. You can easily filter results and it removes BS SEO spam…

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why the hell would you pay for search when the free competitors are just better

      Providing the service is not free, especially something like search that uses a LOT of storage and compute power to index websites. That’s very expensive to do. There’s two options as to how to pay for it:

      1. Pay for it yourself (like what Kagi is doing)
      2. Have someone else pay for it for you. For example, advertising like what Google and Bing do

      The latter is what people mean when they say “you’re the product”. The advertisers are the customers.

      self-host a searx instance

      Two totally different things.

      Searx is a search engine aggregation service. It is not a search engine itself, and you still need the backend search engines to make it useful. Searx could use Kagi though.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Kagi doesn’t index, it’s Google results as a proxy. That’s literally what Searx does, and it’s free. The issues you said with needing to pay for search is solved with Searx even if you claim it doesn’t, it does. Also other search engines like DDG does a crawler + bing results is funded by ads, they’re profitable. The mental gymnastics to pay for a shitty service makes no sense to me, but you do you if you want to support this terrible practice. Not to mention the numerous other issues I listed that you ignored.

        Searx could use Kagi though.

        Lol that makes no sense, and it probably violates Kagi’s ToS. You’re running a self hosted proxy through a service that’s just a proxy for Google results. Just set Searx to search Google for the exact same thing.

        “If you aren’t paying for something, you are the product” sounds nice, but isn’t true. Advertisment can exist and you can still not the product.

        Instead it somehow makes more sense to pay for a privacy invasive search engine that requires a login, requires cookies, and doesn’t work in private search.

          • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Typically every search query on Kagi will call a number of different sources at the same time, all with the purpose of bringing the best possible search results to the user.

            But most importantly, we are known for our unique results, coming from our web index (internal name - Teclis) and news index (internal name - TinyGem). Kagi’s indexes provide unique results that help you discover non-commercial websites and “small web” discussions surrounding a particular topic.

            They just proxy searches and then sort them lol. Definitely caching thrown in there too, as if that even changes anything. You’re paying $10/mo for that when DDG does the same thing for free.

            • abaci@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It says right there they have their own index, that they are pulling from Google et Al and also their own. Whether it’s worth $10, I dunno. But it sounds like more than just an aggregator

              • Peter Bronez@hachyderm.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                @abaci @mojo 100% worth it for me.

                I switched from Google to #DDG to #Kagi. Even if the results were exactly the same, Kagi is FAST. The whole experience is very snappy.

                Beyond that:

                - All your DDG bangs work, and you can add custom bangs

                - They have some neat AI summarization features.

                - You can manually boost/penalize/block domains

                - Lenses focus your search on particular kinds of sites

                • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Comments like these really make this feel like this is astroturfing. It makes no sense to shill for a product this hard, let alone a really privacy invasive one that is worse the free alternatives.

    • Mnglw@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      what search engines are actually good these days?

      because that’s the problem, they aren’t

      search results have gone down a sharp hill lately

      I don’t think Kagi is the answer, but there is a problem - a big one

    • Kayn@dormi.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why the hell would you pay for search when the free competitors are just better

      Explain how they’re better.

      Also it’s automatically not private when it requires a login.

      Just because something requires a login, doesn’t mean searches are logged. That’s something you and I simply can’t know.

      “If it’s free then you’re the product” isn’t even true when search engines are ad supported

      Explain.

      If you really want to pay while not having to login, self-host a searx instance

      And you easy do you think this is for the average Joe?

      Unless you can actually explain your points, you should stop arguing in bad faith.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah if you literally just scrolled down, I elaborated on everything. Keep your “bad faith” bullshit to yourself when you’re doing it to me. Quit the astroturfing. Also yes, having an account means they objectively can track you since queries are coming from an account. There is zero guarantee they are not logging. You are shilling. “If it’s free then you’re the product” is just not a thing that’s true in reality. DDG has ads based off of search keywords. Wikipedia is entirely donations. Services exists without the user being the product.

        • Kayn@dormi.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is zero guarantee they are not logging.

          There is also zero guarantee that they are logging. Both are equally true.

          DDG has ads based off of search keywords.

          That’s still using the general DDG userbase as a product. Just because the ads aren’t personalized, doesn’t mean you’re not a product for ad placement.

          Wikipedia is entirely donations.

          Wikipedia is run by a non-profit organization. If something offered by a business is free, then you are the product.