Would they have all still fought against him?

  • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think he should have cut the pregnancy rate to a third of what it is now. No one would notice. No one would die or be missed. There’d just be a lot less people within fifty years.

    • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      OK while that would be a better idea the thought that no one would notice is laughable. We have detailed pregnancy rate records going back 75 years, an immediate 30% change would definitely raise a lot of red flags.