With the mass migrations of Reddit users to Lemmy/Kbin, and Twitter now speedrunning its own mass extinction, it seems me that the eventual future of social media is de-centralized. I like how Lemmy is slowing turning out, even if it still has some work to do and growing pains to fix up. It’s still able to inform me of all of the current events I want and has a large enough community that it doesn’t feel empty.

I think a similar path will present itself for a de-centralized video media platform like PeerTube, since YouTube will eventually piss off enough of its users to cause a similar kind of exodus. Wanting to jump in on the concept at an early stage, I signed up for a channel on spectra.video and uploaded my video collection there.

But, I don’t really see the same kind of community and usefulness on PeerTube. I check out the Discover and Trending pages, and it just seems like the same set of videos, really. There’s not enough content to keep PeerTube from looking like a small indie project. I can click on Recently Added and it is usually other people just dumping their channel collections, instead of recent adds of new videos. It’s very easy to scroll down and find videos from months ago.

After poking around on various other PeerTube sites, I think I found the real problem with the platform: Federation.

For example, let’s look at how federated Lemmy’s community is:

All interconnected with hundreds and hundreds (if not thousands) of other instances. If you sign up for one Lemmy account, you have little risk in not being able to access a remote community elsewhere. It feels like a federated community, where everything is de-centralized, but communication is linked everywhere. I can even link to my own video channel from Lemmy.

Now, look at PeerTube’s instance lists, based on what I’ve seen on the Join PeerTube site:

It’s all so bare. At most, 80-90 instances for some sites. I can’t see a lot of other instances’ videos, and they can’t see mine. Not from here or here or here or here or here or here or here or here.

It makes PeerTube a large collection of small silos, instead of a real federated community. People want to be able to sign on to an instance and find the content they want without having to jump through all of these different instances. Subscription feeds rely on having a unified list from many different instances. The technology has a lot of potential, but the PeerTube community is not nearly as organized as the rest of the Fediverse.

This sounds like a somewhat simple problem to solve, but I’m not sure what other kind of technological hurdles exist. How did the Lemmy community solve it?

  • MetaStatistical@lemmy.filmOPEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    I think there needs to be an option to link to a PeerTube instance without having to always host the material. Have some sites where you host videos, but other peers where you don’t because you can’t afford to host all of it. That would at least solve the federation problem. Hopefully, they can have enough “tier 1” peers (seeders) to serve the content from multiple sources.

    Also, why can’t videos use torrent technology to serve the data by other viewers?

    • kalfa@lemmy.ml
      2·
      1 year ago

      Also, why can’t videos use torrent technology to serve the data by other viewers?

      from what i read, they do.

      i think the problem is the kind of distributed systems it was designed to be vs the kind we are talking about.

      PT won’t be, at the current state of propagation of content, redundancy and accessibility of content, a replacement for YT or similar.

      it could be, but today it cannot.

      there is another post mentioning how if certain Lemmy instances keep growing they’ll need economic support.

      it smells PT, the way it’s organised today, needs support right now.

      there are various ways to optimise data propagation and replication for scalability of content.

      I think the discussion needs to be open towards this question