• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not who you replied to but I like the idea of a single new country for both Palestinians and Israelis. I think this would avoid the ethnostate issue.

    Ultimately I think the only way forward is to aim for peaceful coexistence between the two groups.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Great idea! Maybe we could look to history to find the last time that Jews and Muslims lived peacefully together in a single state, and name the new country whatever that is.

      Hmmm… Looks like in the 1900s there was a country called Palestine where Muslims and Jews live equally. Let’s get rid of Israel and Palestine, and replace them both with Palestine.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think another main component of it would be religion being taken less seriously across the board.

        It should be allowed to exist but it should be thought of more as superstition. Sort of like horoscopes or tarot cards.

        Then it becomes pretty absurd to commit violence over it. I’m not really sure how to get to this point but there is technically room for both cultures.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This is the larger problem, in a nutshell. The fact that we have nations being led by people who believe in their own fairy tales, so much that they believe everybody else is inferior. This isn’t just a problem in Israel/Palestine, obviously, but having two of these groups so close to each other really puts a magnifying glass on the danger of non-secular governments. Israel literally believes it has the support of God itself, and its a powerful fuel to their genocide.

          I think if we are to survive as a species, one of the humps we need to get over is the existence of all these fairy tales, and the division they create. The fairy tales may have been useful at one point in history, but they have long overstayed their welcome.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Judaism used to be a polytheistic religion, and Islam used to be Judaism. There is no law against polytheism in the Torah. The first commandment, “You shall have no other gods before Me”, allows for other gods who are revered less than Elohim. Judaism and Islam do not need to be violent religions. Putting violence in them was a choice that humans made.

          The Nakba is not the result of Judaism. It is the result of men like Winston Churchill, who was an agnostic raised Christian. Generations of Jewish Israelis since then have allowed an outsider to define their religion, and tell them to be violent. This is not an issue of religion, it’s an issue of human politics.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I do agree however a country that is based on religious participation is fundamentally flawed. I dont think it holds up in that regard. But yes it does have a place in smaller community and in personal life, although I’d argue far less than is shown now.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There has never been a country called Palestine. What are you talking about?

        There are more Arabs living in Israel than there are jews living in all the current Arab nations combined.

        In other words : it’s not so simple to solve

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Isn’t the issue of a single country that the Palestinian population is much higher than the Israeli population, so if there were a single democracy, it would mean that Palestinians would basically be fully in charge?

      I think this is why a federated or two state solution is often suggested. Both parties need at least some level of autonomy.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The idea is ultimately that the people mix and there is no real barrier between the two groups anyways. There should still be places to worship for everyone although I think religion needs to be taken less seriously all around as part of that. Religion creates division just like race does.

        I think the state I’m envisioning is after the part you are talking about though. Its likely there will be a period of imbalance but that does not mean that the bigger group cannot be fair to the smaller one.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Isn’t the issue of a single country that the Palestinian population is much higher than the Israeli population, so if there were a single democracy, it would mean that Palestinians would basically be fully in charge?

        Should we segregate America just because some minorities are outnumbered?