Wasn’t even close. 60/40.

  • ECB@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t know anything about the campaign in Oregon, but most people are scared of things they aren’t familiar with.

    Also I’m guessing neither party really supported this much, since they benefit from first-past-the-post.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Wonder what the campaign against it was. This seems like a easy win. It’s not even a religious thing like pro-choice.

      • evidences@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Probably just a bunch of bullshit falsehoods, look at the campaign against issue 1 in Ohio. It was a change to the state constitution to put a citizen run commission in place to draw maps for voting districts and Republicans ran a campaign that was just straight up lying about what the issue was about. Then even threw misleading ballot language on the ballot, I doubt anyone read the ballot language though because it was a small novel.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Issue 1 took up the entire back page of my ballot yesterday and was just nonsensical legalese. People voted on it based on how there prefered candidates told them to, and we all saw who their preferred candidates were last night.

      • ECB@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Politics (especially among republicans) has become a bit religious, so it’s not really THAT different I guess