• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    You should NEVER have an adult in the back with the child lock on… since they couldn’t escape in an emergency….

    Normal vehicles don’t have a bypass, so an adult would be locked in any vehicle if it was on….

    Tesla’s atleast have a feature to overcome this….

    It’s quite sad that you needed this explained…. Do you even own a drivers license? If you do, please turn it in for the safety of everyone on the road, not just the adults you lock in the back seat…

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I guess you never forgot anything in your life.

      Did you know you shouldn’t carry people in your trunk? Yet by law the trunk needs to have a (glow in the dark!) way to be opened from the inside if it’s not a hatchback vehicle. Crazy right?

      An emergency measure has a purpose, it’s to be used in an emergency. If it can be bypassed then it fails as an emergency measure. What’s funny is that Tesla agrees because the emergency door release bypasses child lock, like it should.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Sure I have, and adults can be locked in the back of a normal car with zero way out.

        Yet you want to argue that a hard to access release is bad…?

        When this problem in a worse way has already ex is Ted for decades…?

        Childlocks have zero override, and Teslas do, and yet the argument is child safety…? It’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety. So now there is conflicting safety laws…… you didn’t see that coming now did you? Yeah…

        Yes I know it overrides it… that’s not the argument. The argument was, children could be back there, it’s a stupid argument since you can lock them in the back to ANY vehicle, (but Tesla as you stupidly pointed out to ruin your own argument….), so to cry the children can’t find it… is the stupidest fucking argument that could be used to decry this…

        Do you need this explained again? Or can you finally comprehend why the argument about children is a red herring?

        Trunks don’t have a manual release in the back…. That why they require one…. If they had a manual handle, they wouldn’t require the other handle. As you said hardback don’t need one, why? Because you can crawl into the front where you have access to a manual handle.

        You seem to know the rules, but not why, yet you insult that I shouldn’t be in safety? Maybe you should comprehend the rules instead of just knowing them, massive difference and you’ve shown your massively lacking surface knowledge while defending “children could be back there). You know wheee they can be locked in with no escape in ANY OTHER VEHILCE… lmfao you’re not very bright dude.

        But I’m done explaining simple things to someone who can only argue, the children!!! While missing the entire point….

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            It’s all child safety, yet you can’t grasp that?

            Last message.

            Child locks are so children can’t open the door and fall out of a moving vehicle, Tesla’s emergency release overrides said child lock. If it was easily accessible a child could use it and fall out of moving vehicle still. So hence why it’s not an easily accessible handle. Since doing that would endanger children in more situations… you’re a bloody moron if you can’t comprehend this.

            Hence why it’s marginally hard to access… so it’s not randomly pulled.

            Got it yet? Or do you need some diagrams? Because that’s too much work.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yep, you invented a conversation that didn’t happen the way the actual conversation did and now you’re contradicting yourself.

              Ok buhbye!