• tangentism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Musk: People who WFH are lazy and should come back to the office

    Musk: …but I aint paying the rent on that office!

    • JakeBacon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of a meme (read brilliant idea) I saw where US minimum wage should be tied to average rent in order to start a war between landlords and companies.

      • TooTallSol@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s one way companies cancel leases and may be the best way to break a lease depending on how it’s written. Then they get evicted and the lease is cancelled.

        Look at San Francisco and all the companies just walking away from buildings while stopping any payments to said leases and loans. It’s not that uncommon.

        • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          What kind of damages would breaking a lease create compared to not paying rent and getting evicted after months? Why wouldn’t you still be in the hook for breaking a lease?

          • blakerboy777@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, this really doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. The way a commercial lease is written, you owe all rent for the agreed upon term, to be paid monthly. If you want to break the lease, early termination may have some slight benefit or a way to mitigate having to pay out the entire term- for example you may be able to find a new tenenat and negotiate a smaller fee for breaking the lease since the landlord will have no loss in income. If you just stiff them on the payments, they will obviously just sue you for the full amount with no way to mitigate that. Who would write a lease that let one party unilaterally out of their obligation when they break the terms of the contract?

  • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Twitter is dying, but not some very spectacular death of the service stopping to work altogether in one day, but a slow, painful one.

  • sebsauvage@framapiaf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    @mint
    Si je comprend bien, apres des toilettes qui puent parce qu’ils ne paient pas l’entreprise de nettoyage, ils se font virer de leurs locaux parce qu’ils ne paient pas le loyer, et ils ne veulent pas non plus payer les factures du cloud de Google qu’ils utilisent.
    Mais Elon est un génie.
    Wokay.

    • Marud@lemmy.marud.fr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Y a des gens qui promeuvent son intelligence, hein. Je pense que c’est pour ces gens là que les étiquettes “ne pas boire” ont été inventées sur les bouteilles de javel.

  • trex@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t Elon wante to end remote work? Seems like he needs to make up is mind…

    • Anarch157a@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Naah. This is (in his POV) excelent. He can just fire an e-mail at 3:00AM saying: “Everyone from Boulder will have to check in to the SF office by tomorrow. If you fail to do so, I’ll assume you abandoned work and is no longer employed at Twitter”.

      What a POS…

      • EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thankfully the laws aren’t always super dumb and take into account pretext. For example, if he said “If you don’t show up to work in San Francisco then I will take that as your resignation.” then it would be what’s called a constructive dismissal. It is in fact a termination, because the demands are so unreasonable precisely in order to get employees to quit. So he’d still be on the hook for any severance owed, etc

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So he’d still be on the hook for any severance owed, etc

          He’s being sued left and right for… *checks notes… not paying severance. So I’m not so sure “on the hook for severance” means much either.

  • JayDurst@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I await the day a sheriff shows up at one of their offices to confiscate some property to settle debts.

  • LostCause@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pathetic. How anyone can deal or invest with “businessmen” like Trump and Musk who mainly grift, steal, lie and don‘t even pay their debts—no clue!

    • Zelsabriel@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The irony of the man choosing to use the name Tesla when he’s just another Edison.

      Actually, even that is probably giving him too much credit…