BarterClub@sh.itjust.worksM to Antiwork@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWe're likely to start hearing unionbusting lies about how studios and streamers can't afford to pay actors fairly because “the writers took all the money.”sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1585arrow-down116cross-posted to: unions@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1569arrow-down1imageWe're likely to start hearing unionbusting lies about how studios and streamers can't afford to pay actors fairly because “the writers took all the money.”sh.itjust.worksBarterClub@sh.itjust.worksM to Antiwork@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: unions@lemmy.ml
minus-squareNumber1SummerJam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up76arrow-down5·1 year agoIs there a better source for this than a graph on Facebook that adds up to 100.02%?
minus-squareDeath__BySnuSnu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up54arrow-down12·1 year ago"Please note that the percentages in these pie graphs do not add up to 100% because the math was done by a woman. For those of you hissing at that joke, it should be uh noted that that joke was written by a woman. So, now you don’t know what the hell to think, huh? Nah, I’m just kidding. We don’t hire women." -Norm MacDonald, Weekend Update
minus-squareSARGEx117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down2·1 year agoI, too would like a source with a better breakdown. But it’s not surprising that a computer would round up when dealing with under 0.01% on a graph.
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m guessing it’s a rounding error with some of the entries being less than 0.01. Also it’s twitter.
minus-squarehihellobyeoh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoI would assume that all, or most of the 0.01% are actually less than that, but no one wanted to read a bunch of 0.007% on a pie chart.
Is there a better source for this than a graph on Facebook that adds up to 100.02%?
"Please note that the percentages in these pie graphs do not add up to 100% because the math was done by a woman.
For those of you hissing at that joke, it should be uh noted that that joke was written by a woman.
So, now you don’t know what the hell to think, huh?
Nah, I’m just kidding. We don’t hire women."
-Norm MacDonald, Weekend Update
I, too would like a source with a better breakdown.
But it’s not surprising that a computer would round up when dealing with under 0.01% on a graph.
I’m guessing it’s a rounding error with some of the entries being less than 0.01. Also it’s twitter.
I would assume that all, or most of the 0.01% are actually less than that, but no one wanted to read a bunch of 0.007% on a pie chart.