Now we are facing an unprecedented growth of AI as a whole. Do you think is time for FSF elaborate a new version of GPL to incorporate the new challenges of AI in software development to keep protecting users freedom?

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s not how copyrights work. They only care about copying or replicating that data. The hint is in the name

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Copyright is not just about copying the data. It’s a name that stuck but it’s more accurately to call it “author rights”. The law awards the rights holder extensive rights, including deciding how the data is used.

      And (as an aside) permission by omission doesn’t work as an excuse either, if the right to use the data in some way hasn’t been explicitly granted it most likely doesn’t apply.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No that’s not what copyrights are. The idea that they’re “author rights” has no basis in law

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why insist to argue this point when a simple visit to Wikipedia will show I’m right?