[EDIT] Inb4 more people try to suggest that I’m mourning the loss of this scumbag capitalist fuck: No, I’m not sad he’s dead. No, I don’t think corporate murder is acceptable and no, I would not ever rat to police if I knew the shooter and yes, I believe the punishment fits the crimes he’s committed against untold thousands of people. THAT SAID…

I’m not down with vigilante murder or anything because it seems like the slipperiest of slopes toward chaos, but what other option is there in a situation where someone seeks to make an impact in this way? You can’t just beat up evil CEOs and let them go back to work. It would be naïve to expect them to change their ways when faced with consequences for their actions and then promptly let go. It just seems like the chances that it emboldens their penchant for exploitative behaviour and disdain for people in need are too high.

We’re just born into and strapped to this capitalist ride and expected to sit quiet and make these leeches their billions. How else can this cancerous greed possibly be dealt with? Is vigilante murder the only effective option? Honest questions. I’m terribly conflicted and I’m genuinely curious what more reasonable and intelligent minds than mine think about this because I can’t think of an alternative to murder in this case.

Ideally, we wouldn’t have to resort to vigilante killings to level the playing field but I 100% understand that we don’t live in a society where the rich will ever give a fuck about the rest of us or would ever sacrifice their power over us in the name of goodwill.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    1041·
    9 days ago

    Killing in the defense of others is a legal defense to homicide.

    If the guy were attacking people with a machete, nobody would dream of prosecuting the person who put him down.

    The fact that he’s doing it slightly more slowly, but on a massively larger scale should not change anything.

    • solomon42069@lemmy.world
      521·
      9 days ago

      The fact that he’s doing it slightly more slowly, but on a massively larger scale should not change anything.

      This is something that I hope society learns to comprehend and act on more effectively in the future.

      A lot of today’s huge problems we’ve known about since I was a kid 30 years ago - climate change, corporate greed, housing crisis, immigration, etc. I spent most of my times growing up arguing with adults, having my lived experience questioned. I thought there would be a tipping point when I started working, or paying my own way through life, where the condescension would stop but it never did.

      The current older generation has lived longer than any other in history, and they’ve clung to control for as long as possible. Even when younger leaders come in, they’re still trapped in these outdated values—Victorian at best—that keep pulling us backwards. Somehow, they’ve convinced themselves that investors deserve their returns more than people deserve to live. It’s soul crushing.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldEnglish
        16·
        9 days ago

        The current older generation has lived longer than any other in history, and they’ve clung to control for as long as possible

        And they’ve used that time to change laws and tax codes to ensure their power and money will pass to their children, forming lasting dynasties who will continue their extortive behavior.

      • daddy32@lemmy.world
        63·
        8 days ago

        immigration

        Is it really a big issue or are you just internalizing the language of the oppressing class, putting common people against each other?

        The current older generation has lived longer than any other in history, and they’ve clung to control for as long as possible.

        And now you’re adding ageism to the mix. It is not old people who are the problem! Keep your eyes fixed on the real enemies and don’t target your exploited fellows.