• NotAGoodUser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the beauty of have a multitude of different apps. You choose the one that feels right for you. Much like how you can choose another Lemmy instance.

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, sure, you can choose whatever you want. It doesn’t make my opinion wrong. It’s not in the philosophy of the fediverse. People can use it with an ads tracked app of they want. I respect it.

      It’s a hard no for me and I will express it. It could be a hard yes if they will be a one time payment version without free ads base one.

      • Pillarist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The dev said there already will be. I hope you’ll support a hard working, singular dev who puts a lot of work into an app and engages with its users like LJD.

      • utopianrevolt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        an opinion cannot be wrong. but it also cannot be right. you make a fair point with what you’re saying. the dev is already planning on a single time purchase, but a sub option is definitely not “morally wrong.”

        • moitoi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It can be morally wrong depending on the person’s visions. It’s not that this vision is wrong or right. It’s a personal one. Nobody did this vision mandatory.

          • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Although I do not agree with your opinion above, but I think your opinion is valid and you don’t deserve the downvotes.

            My opinion is that Sync and Lemmy are two different things with two different philosophies. Yes they are interconnected, but they are both separate entities, and it’s not like Sync is built off of Lemmy’s source code. The dev should get compensated for the time and resources he put into the source code of Sync, and if ads is a way to contribute to that, then so be it.

      • NotAGoodUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think your opinion is wrong. It’s an opinion, and that’s fine.

        As a developer myself, I do understand that the dev wants to be compensated for all the hours he puts in, but I am also aware that we’re all using software everyday in many different ways that are made in the free time of many people, without any compensation. Both are valid.