• AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, he could try to actually make it a usable platform and offer features people might be willing to pay for?

    Think about it, this blue checkmark subscription would have absolutely worked two years ago. You have to prove who you are, pay 10 bucks a month and then you’ll get the checkmark. A lot of people and institutions would have done that.

    Offering advanced, paid features for professionals might also help. Like user management or thread based user mappings, so that large accounts can get management by a team efficiently. Companies are definitely willing to pay substantial amounts of money for things like that.

    • pensa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could he though? I don’t think he is that smart. He has smart people running his other companies, but he is running the show at twitter. I think this is us seeing him fail when left on his own.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is not the question. He does have option, whether he is willing and able to realize them, is another question.

        Anyway, unless there is some serious change of policy (and realistically, ownership) happening over a Twitter, is will slowly die off.

    • anlumo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The first thing he did at Twitter (as it was called back then) was to fire most developers. There’s no way he can introduce significant new features.