• Serdan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ridiculous take.

    There’s a vast difference between using a cloud service that definitely spies on you, and a self-hosted solution that you can ensure doesn’t.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ridiculous take is the joke:

      but wait the hardware is not defined by you -it cannot be trusted!

    • gelberhut@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ridiculous conspiracy about “definitely spies”, especially in the android community.

      I remember someone tried to sue Google for reading his emails, because Anti-Spam must “read” mails to detect spams.

      Anyways, for people who are afraid of cloud spions nothing is changed, for people who are interested in Google assistant boosting GA with bard is a promising improvement.

      • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        In this case it’s less about “spying” and more about data being used for training.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      a self-hosted solution that you can ensure doesn’t.

      Being self-hosted in no way, shape, or form ensures that it doesn’t spy on you. You’re still putting trust in a third-party to keep their promises. The average user lacks the know-how to audit code. Hell, the average user wouldn’t be able to figure out self-hosting in the first place.