• psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I left a private sector job where I did increasingly evil things for a good amount of money for a public works job where I’m doing something beneficial to society. I have to work a shit-ton of OT to make the same money but the OT is there for the working and I ultimately maybe work a hair more than I used to in my salary position.

  • Rory Butler Music@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a public service job.

    Can’t afford to live, get shouted at by callers irrelevant to my role each day just cos I am at a phone, can’t work from home despite the whole organisation doing so, higher paid people throw their workload at me cos they don’t want to do it.

    Feels no different from when i was in the private sector really.

    • atetulo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can’t afford to live

      At what quality of life?

      I find it hard to believe you have a public service job that can’t pay for your peanut butter sandwiches and vegetables to stay alive.

      • Rory Butler Music@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The wording was a tad dramatic.

        I can afford to eat. But I can’t afford housing and any enjoyment comes with guilt from knowing itll have a knock on effect to my finances. I’m living with a parent (who similarly struggles to pay bills)

        It’s more a case of finding it hard to hit the bills and not being able to see a future where I’m comfortable.

        I’d say it’s mostly due to the cost of living rather than the pay. 10 years ago I’d be doing quite well, but the pay grades haven’t changed to meet inflation or accommodate for the high cost of living.

    • Steve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think you’re thinking of deionized.

      • sebinspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        First rule of English: learn every word

        Second rule of English: Consistency is one of those words

        Third rule of English: Consistency does not apply to English

  • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably not taxes of the rich, who use havens and methods to avoid paying taxes. It’s the people paying.

  • ieightpi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mind elaborating on this rich tax? I’m honestly curious but also feeling skeptical. I’m starting to think this is just a joke since it’s in meme form.

    • ScrotusMaximus@lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A grant (taxpayer money) funded company creating jobs that will eventually run out of money while having the double benefit of poors feeling empowered and forgetting/not caring who is siphoning off the value of the company slowly.

      Context: https://lemmy.ninja/comment/2180478

  • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been working at a rich ladies house the last few weeks.

    If you used her money to feed an entire town for a month, she wouldn’t even know.

    • bullant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      100% they mean average working class families. We all know the real rich don’t pay proper taxes

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are some thing that will always be dangerous and there’s nothing that can be done to mitigate risks. See also: linemen. Electricity is pretty goddam indifferent.

      However, if your union was not helping at all, then you need to have a word with union leadership or, maybe, replace them :)

    • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are very few guarantees ever.

      Not having a union guarantees having no power when the bosses stomp their boots over the faces of workers.

      A union is just workers agreeing and organizing among themselves that they prefer to fight back. United we can build the power we need to make meaningful advances.

      There is no reason simply to let the bosses take whatever they want just because no one tried to stop them.