• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do they send this data over the network? Or is the data only used by the software installed on the machine?

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They can do whatever they want. Operating systems are effectively divided into two partitions, privileged kernel space and user space.

      When you run a kernel level anticheat what you’re really doing is running a custom program in the kernel space. It effectively becomes part of Windows.

      This means that anything that an operating system can instruct hardware to do, that program can do. It can read your files, check your email, print letter you wrote to your crush in Word but “deleted” because it was embarrassing, log every key you type, turn on your webcam, listen to the microphone, download explicit or illegal imagery, upload your hard drive to the NSA, disable your computer fans, etc

      You really only want to run this stuff if it’s from a trustworthy vendor and even then it’s completely defensible to object to running one of these programs.

      Currently these things have yet to be caught doing any of these things, but that’s because they haven’t been instructed to, not because they can’t.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Microsoft are going to significantly limit what can run in the kernel (including anti cheat) after the Crowdstrike issue. A side-effect of that should (hopefully) be better Linux compatibility.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I remember reading that and I very much hope it is truly what they end up doing. As of now though, that has yet to materialize.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess what I’m saying is if this information was being sent across a network, that would be detectable.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I guess what I’m saying is if this information was being sent across a network, that would be detectable.

          If you are constantly monitoring 24/7/365, sure. We don’t know how often it would send it if it does, it would require reverse engineering and intense monitoring. Also, even if they aren’t doing it now doesn’t mean they can’t easily add it in a patch.

          It’s generally not worth trusting IMO.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Sure, but by then it could be too late for the vast majority of people.

          It’s not super relevant if nobody is looking for it/it’s hard to detect even if you are and plenty of damage can be done prior to detection.