ijeff@lemdro.id to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoCiting slow Starship reviews, SpaceX urges FAA to double licensing staffarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down14cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todayfuturology@futurology.todaytechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkCiting slow Starship reviews, SpaceX urges FAA to double licensing staffarstechnica.comijeff@lemdro.id to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todayfuturology@futurology.todaytechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down1·1 year ago Their mission is to enable safe spaceflight. We cannot give up on the safety side, but could there be a little bit more emphasis on the enable side? Maybe if SpaceX hadn’t just destroyed a launch pad and the surrounding area I would be more sympathetic.
minus-squarekiwifoxtrot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoSpace X was also very slow in getting the required report to the agency to review. Perhaps Space X should have done a better job there instead of rushing ahead to the next launch.
Maybe if SpaceX hadn’t just destroyed a launch pad and the surrounding area I would be more sympathetic.
Space X was also very slow in getting the required report to the agency to review. Perhaps Space X should have done a better job there instead of rushing ahead to the next launch.