I understand that teams in these contracts are paying for future production, not past production. If I’m going to give you like $100M, I’d like to have some past production. Patrick Williams has done some stuff, but like that’s just… if that’s the number, if that ends up being true and the Vassell deal ends up being the comp that his agents go to, that’s a lot of cheese.

Starting about 32 minutes into The Lowe Post.

  • Muted_Dog7317@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d much rather have Vassell. He’s a much better all around player who still gives a lot on defense.

    Who do you think Pat Will is? He’s not DPOY candidate or the best defender on his team. He’s a good defender but not elite.

    • TheRealDevDev@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      agree to disagree. i’d take pat williams over vassell 10/10 times. you can always find a 6’5" wing that can dribble and shoot a little. what’s actually rare is having a forward sized beast who can guard every player on the court and doesn’t make mistakes (while being money from 3 on offense).

      • Just-Efficiency3129@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        PWIll makes tons of mistakes like evry fucking game holy shit thank you for admitting you’ve never seen him play a game. I’ve see seen literally dozens of games where he is completely useless lmfao

      • Muted_Dog7317@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean you say Vassell can shoot a little but he takes more than double the attempts of Pat Williams from 3 and shoots 39%. He’s also got a 6’10 wingspan and can play-make, and defend multiple positions. It’s not a common skillset