fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agoimaginemander.xyzimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageimaginemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square34linkfedilink
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoNo they won’t. They will sue you if you take your neighbors pesticide resistant seeds, sow them, douse them in pesticide so only the resistant ones survive, and sow your entire field with them.
minus-squareunalivejoy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoClassic piracy. The original product is still there; you’re just making a copy.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoI mean, I totally agree with all forms of breaking IP law on ethical grounds. But I also recognise that it’s still breaking the law right now.
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·4 months agoWhy “but”? Why are those two statements viewed as contradicting each other in tone?
No they won’t.
They will sue you if you take your neighbors pesticide resistant seeds, sow them, douse them in pesticide so only the resistant ones survive, and sow your entire field with them.
Classic piracy. The original product is still there; you’re just making a copy.
I mean, I totally agree with all forms of breaking IP law on ethical grounds. But I also recognise that it’s still breaking the law right now.
Why “but”? Why are those two statements viewed as contradicting each other in tone?