Not to take away his rings in Miami and LA, but it seems to be accepted by most people that the 2016 championship was the most important title that LeBron won (legacy wise), since Cleveland was a much smaller market and it was his hometown team. My question is, if the Cavs lost 4 years in a row to the Warriors, and LeBron left Cleveland again ringless, would there still be a strong argument for him to be 2nd all time?

  • maybeacademicweapon@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Obviously not, losing your greatest achievement is going to damage your resume in some way or form. Although, he would still be widely considered top 5 purely off his stats/longevity.