External_Key_3515@alien.topB to Watches@style.landEnglish · 11 months ago[SeikoSRPD59] Not sure why other watchmakers don't look at Seiko, and think "we need good lume like them!" Am I crazy?alien.topimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1image[SeikoSRPD59] Not sure why other watchmakers don't look at Seiko, and think "we need good lume like them!" Am I crazy?alien.topExternal_Key_3515@alien.topB to Watches@style.landEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareBlastShell@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoThe only criticism I have with my Khaki Auto is the lume. You’d think for a field watch the lume would be at least a little better.
minus-squareAcceptable-Yak7968@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoThe lume is pretty terrible on my Murph as well. It’s not something that’s super important for me but it’s disappointing considering it cost about $1,000. My 10 year old Orient has better lume.
minus-squaremdp300@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoMine too. I think it’s simply because the indices are a lot smaller than on a diver.
![[SeikoSRPD59] Not sure why other watchmakers don't look at Seiko, and think "we need good lume like them!" Am I crazy?](https://alien.top/pictrs/image/4d179537-281f-469f-82f0-909d0f739df0.webp){kind=link}
The only criticism I have with my Khaki Auto is the lume. You’d think for a field watch the lume would be at least a little better.
The lume is pretty terrible on my Murph as well. It’s not something that’s super important for me but it’s disappointing considering it cost about $1,000. My 10 year old Orient has better lume.
Mine too. I think it’s simply because the indices are a lot smaller than on a diver.