• small44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Ok my mistake but that is just one example. They may exists some two similar community with different rules. I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

    • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

      It is, but that’s an emergency measure, not a day to day basis

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      similar community with different rules.

      In those cases, the communities should not consolidate, and would not “follow each other” under Proposal 3.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        So the solution may only reduce the duplications but not fix it completely. A lot of communities are already dead with no active admins

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          no active admins

          Admins or mods?

          If a community has no active mods, you can usually request it from the admins. If an instance has no active admins, it will probably shut down soon.